Agenda of Te Oneroa a Tohe Beach Board Meeting

Members need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as a Member of the Committee and any private or other external interest they might have. This note is provided as a reminder to Members to review the matters on the agenda and assess and identify where they may have a pecuniary or other conflict of interest, or where there may be a perception of a conflict of interest.

If a Member feels they do have a conflict of interest, they should publicly declare that at the start of the meeting or of the relevant item of business and refrain from participating in the discussion or voting on that item. If a Member thinks they may have a conflict of interest, they can seek advice from the Chief Executive Officer or the Manager - Democracy Services (preferably before the meeting).

It is noted that while members can seek advice the final decision as to whether a conflict exists rests with the member.

Representation roles

Members of the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board are appointed to represent their respective iwi organisations or councils. The existence of these representative roles does not, of itself, constitute a conflict of interest. Members should consider whether they have a personal financial interest or other interest that differs from, or goes beyond, their representative role and could reasonably be seen to influence their decision-making.

3 Ngā Kaikōrero / Speakers

Ben White – Chief Advisor (Ministry for the Environment)

Rachel Ropiha – Policy Advisor (Ministry for the Environment)

Roger Ackers – Head of Reforms Initiatives (Far North District Council)

Te Oneroa a Tohe Beach Board Meeting Agenda

24 July 2026

4 Te Whakaaetanga o Ngā Meneti o Mua / Confirmation of Previous Minutes

4.1 Confirmation of Previous Minutes

File Number: A5876812

Author: Marlema Baker, Democracy Advisor

Authoriser: Aisha Huriwai, Manager - Democracy Services

Purpose of the Report

To enable Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board to confirm that the minutes of the previous meeting are a true and correct record of the proceedings.

The minutes are attached.

Recommendation

That Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board confirm the minutes of the meeting held on 22 May 2026 as a true and correct record.

1) Background

The Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board is a statutory co-governance partnership established under Te Hiku Treaty Settlement legislation and operates as a permanent joint committee of the Far North District Council and Northland Regional Council. The Board's purpose is to provide governance and direction to protect and enhance the environmental, economic, social, cultural and spiritual wellbeing of Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe for present and future generations.

Clause 7 of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002 requires local authorities to keep minutes of their proceedings. Minutes that are duly entered and authenticated, as prescribed, provide prima facie evidence of those proceedings.

As part of good governance practice and in accordance with legislative requirements, the Board is required to confirm the minutes of its previous meeting. Confirmation provides assurance that the official record accurately reflects the decisions, discussions and proceedings of the meeting.

2) Discussion and Options

Relevant legislation and policies

The requirement to keep and confirm meeting minutes is provided for under Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002.

The Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board Standing Orders require that minutes are kept as the official record of meetings and that only the correctness of the minutes may be discussed at a subsequent meeting.

Standing Orders further state that "no discussion shall arise on the substance of the minutes in any succeeding meeting, except as to their correctness."

Confirmation of the minutes supports transparent and accountable governance and ensures an accurate public record of the Board's proceedings.

Options

Option 1 (Recommended): Confirm the minutes as a true and correct record

Advantages:

· Satisfies legislative and governance requirements.

· Confirms the official record of the meeting.

· Ensures certainty regarding resolutions and actions arising from the previous meeting.

· Supports transparency and accountability.

Disadvantages:

· None identified.

Option 2: Amend the minutes prior to confirmation

Advantages:

· Allows correction of any errors or omissions identified by members.

· Ensures the official record accurately reflects proceedings.

Disadvantages:

· May delay final confirmation until corrections are agreed.

Option 3: Do not confirm the minutes

Advantages:

· None identified.

Disadvantages:

· Does not meet good governance practice.

· Creates uncertainty regarding the official record of the meeting.

· May impact the Board's ability to rely upon the minutes as an accurate record of proceedings.

The recommended option is Option 1, subject to any minor corrections identified by the Board.

Significance and engagement

The confirmation of meeting minutes is an administrative governance matter and is considered to be of low significance under the Far North District Council Significance and Engagement Policy.

No specific public engagement is required because the decision relates solely to confirming the accuracy of the record of a previous meeting.

Policy and strategy considerations

Confirmation of the minutes is consistent with:

· Local Government Act 2002 requirements relating to governance and record keeping.

· Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board Terms of Reference.

· Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board Standing Orders.

· Principles of transparency, accountability and effective governance.

The decision does not alter or affect the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Beach Management Plan, Board policies, strategic priorities or operational programmes.

Risk and mitigations

The primary risk associated with this report is that the minutes may contain errors or omissions.

This risk is mitigated through the Board's review of the minutes prior to confirmation and the opportunity to amend the record where necessary before confirmation is granted.

Implications for Māori

There are no direct implications for Māori arising from the confirmation of meeting minutes.

Any implications for Māori associated with matters considered at the previous meeting are addressed through the relevant reports and decisions recorded within those minutes.

The confirmation process itself is administrative in nature and does not involve decisions relating to land, bodies of water, wāhi tapu, taonga or Treaty settlement matters.

Costs of each option

There are no additional costs associated with any of the options outlined in this report.

Confirmation of minutes forms part of the Board's standard governance and administrative processes and is undertaken within existing resources.

REASON FOR THE RECOMMENDATION

The reason for the recommendation is to confirm that the minutes represent a true and correct record of the proceedings of the previous Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board meeting.

3) Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision

There are no financial implications or the need for budgetary provision arising from this report.

Attachments

1. DRAFT Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board Minutes - 22 May 2026 - A5877978 ⇩

Compliance schedule:

Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:

1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,

a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and

b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

c) If any of the options identified under paragraph (a) involves a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water, take into account the relationship of Māori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral land, water sites, wāhi tapu, valued flora and fauna and other taonga.

2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.

Compliance requirement	Staff assessment
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy	This is a matter of low significance as it relates solely to the confirmation of meeting minutes and does not involve any substantive policy, financial or strategic decision.
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision.	This report complies with Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002, the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board Terms of Reference, and the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board Standing Orders relating to the keeping and confirmation of minutes.
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought.	The confirmation of minutes is a matter for the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board. The views of other boards or committees are not required.
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water.	There are no implications for Māori arising from the confirmation of minutes. Any implications relating to matters recorded in the minutes are considered through the relevant reports and decisions of the Board.
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences.	This report seeks confirmation of the minutes as a true and correct record. Any affected parties or stakeholder interests associated with matters discussed at the meeting are considered through the relevant agenda reports.
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision.	There are no financial implications or budgetary provisions required.
Chief Financial Officer review.	The Chief Financial Officer has not reviewed this report.

Te Oneroa a Tohe Beach Board Meeting Agenda

24 July 2026

5 Ngā Pūrongo / Reports

5.1 Te Oneroa-A-Tōhe Board Financials June 2026

File Number: A5877001

Author: Marlema Baker, Te Kuaka Committee Coordinator

Authoriser: Aisha Huriwai, Manager - Democracy Services

Take Pūrongo / Purpose of the Report

To provide the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board with an update on the financial position of the Board as at 30 June 2026 and to receive the financial report for information.

WhakarĀpopoto matua / Executive Summary

This report provides a summary of the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board's financial position and expenditure for the period ending 30 June 2026.

· Key matters covered in this report include:

o The Board's current financial position and available funding balances.

o Expenditure incurred through Board operational activities and Beach Management Plan implementation activities.

o Ongoing administrative and governance costs associated with delivery of the Board's functions.

o Confirmation that expenditure remains aligned with the Board's statutory purpose, Terms of Reference and governance responsibilities.

o The remaining balances available to support future Board operations and implementation of Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe.

o As at 30 June 2026, the Board retains a total fund balance of $99,262.69, comprising $61,228.91 in Operational Funds and $38,033.78 in Plan Development Funds.

tŪtohunga / Recommendation

That Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board:

a) receive the report titled "Financials June 2026"; and

i) note the financial position of the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board as at 30 June 2026, including a remaining balance of $99,262.69, consisting of:

· $61,228.91 remaining in the Board Operational Fund; and

· $38,033.78 remaining in the Plan Development Fund.

1) Tāhuhu Kōrero / Background

The Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board is a co-governance partnership established under Te Hiku Treaty Settlement legislation and operates as a permanent joint committee of Far North District Council and Northland Regional Council. The Board's purpose is to provide governance and direction to protect and enhance the environmental, economic, social, cultural and spiritual wellbeing of Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe for present and future generations.

The Board is responsible for monitoring implementation of Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe (Beach Management Plan), engaging with iwi, councils and beach management agencies, and providing governance oversight of activities occurring within the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe management area.

To support these responsibilities, the Board maintains separate funding allocations for operational activities and Beach Management Plan implementation and development activities. Financial reporting enables the Board to monitor expenditure, maintain accountability and ensure funds are managed in accordance with the Board's statutory obligations and governance responsibilities.

The attached financial statements provide a detailed breakdown of income, expenditure and fund balances for the reporting period ending 30 June 2026.

2) matapaki me NgĀ KŌwhiringa / Discussion and Options

Relevant legislation and/or policies

This report has been prepared having regard to:

· Local Government Act 2002.

· Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987.

· Te Hiku Treaty Settlement legislation.

· Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Terms of Reference.

· Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Standing Orders.

· Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe (Beach Management Plan).

The Beach Management Plan emphasises responsible governance, collaboration, leadership and accountability in protecting and enhancing Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe. Regular financial reporting supports these outcomes by providing transparency regarding the use of resources allocated to the Board.

Options

Option 1 (Recommended): Receive the financial report

Advantages

· Provides transparent financial information to Board members.

· Supports good governance and accountability.

· Enables ongoing monitoring of operational and project expenditure.

· Ensures members are informed when considering future priorities and implementation actions.

Disadvantages

· None identified.

Option 2: Request further financial analysis before receiving the report

Advantages

· Allows additional financial detail to be considered if required.

Disadvantages

· Delays formal acknowledgement of the Board's financial position.

· May result in unnecessary administrative work where sufficient information has already been provided.

Option 1 is recommended.

Significance and engagement

In accordance with the Far North District Council Significance and Engagement Policy, this report is considered to be of low significance.

The report provides financial information only and does not propose any new policy, operational change or decision affecting the public, iwi or stakeholders. No engagement is required for the purpose of receiving the report.

Policy and strategy considerations

Receiving the report supports implementation of the governance and leadership objectives contained within Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe, particularly the outcomes that seek effective stewardship, collaboration and responsible management of resources associated with Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe.

The report aligns with the Board's statutory purpose and assists in maintaining oversight of activities funded to support implementation of the Beach Management Plan.

Risk and mitigations

The primary risk is ineffective monitoring of Board expenditure and available funding.

This risk is mitigated through regular financial reporting, review by Board members and oversight from council staff responsible for administration of Board finances.

Implications for Māori

The Board itself exists as a Treaty settlement co-governance arrangement between Te Hiku iwi and local government partners. The Board's governance functions, including financial oversight, help support delivery of the vision and objectives contained within Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe.

This report does not seek a decision relating to land, a body of water, wāhi tapu or other taonga. Therefore, no direct implications for Māori arise from receiving the report.

The report supports the ongoing partnership approach established through Treaty settlement legislation and reflects the Board's statutory governance responsibilities.

Costs of each option

Option 1

· No additional cost. Financial reporting forms part of normal Board administration.

Option 2

· Potential additional staff time and administrative costs associated with preparing supplementary analysis.

TAKE TŪTOHUNGA / REASON FOR THE RECOMMENDATION

Receiving the financial report ensures the Board remains informed of its current financial position and can continue to exercise effective governance and oversight of funds allocated to support delivery of its statutory functions and the implementation of Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe.

3) PĀnga PŪtea me ngĀ wĀhanga tahua / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision

As at 30 June 2026:

Fund	Balance Remaining
Operational Fund	$61,228.91
Plan Development Fund	$38,033.78
Total Available Funds	$99,262.69

Revenue for the reporting period consisted primarily of interest earnings totalling $1,529.55. Expenditure totalled $5,496.66, including meeting allowances, administrative costs, software subscriptions and venue hire.

The recommendation to receive the report has no additional financial implications beyond existing approved budget provisions.

Āpitihanga / Attachments

1. Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board Financials June 2026 - attachment 1 - A5877351 ⇩

2. Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board Financials June 2026 - attachment 2 - A5877354 ⇩

Hōtaka Take Ōkawa / Compliance Schedule:

Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:

1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,

a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and

b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.

He Take Ōkawa / Compliance Requirement	Aromatawai Kaimahi / Staff Assessment
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy	Low significance. The report is informational only and does not seek a significant decision or change in service levels.
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision.	Local Government Act 2002; Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987; Te Hiku Treaty Settlement legislation; Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Terms of Reference; Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Standing Orders; Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe.
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought.	This report relates specifically to governance and financial management of the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board. Community Board views have not been sought as no decision affecting community board delegations is required.
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. State the possible implications and how this report aligns with Te Tiriti o Waitangi / The Treaty of Waitangi.	The Board is a Treaty settlement co-governance body comprising Iwi and council representatives. The report does not seek a decision relating to land or water and therefore has no direct implications for Māori.
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example – youth, the aged and those with disabilities).	Interested parties include Board members, iwi partners, Far North District Council and Northland Regional Council. The report is informational and does not directly affect the public.
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision.	Financial implications are outlined in Section 3. Existing Board funds provide for current operational requirements.
Chief Financial Officer review.	The report should be submitted to the Chief Financial Officer for review through the Infocouncil review process prior to final agenda publication.

Te Oneroa a Tohe Beach Board Meeting Agenda

24 July 2026

5.2 Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board - Future Funding Options

File Number: A5877334

Author: Marlema Baker, Te Kuaka Committee Coordinator

Authoriser: Aisha Huriwai, Manager - Democracy Services

Take Pūrongo / Purpose of the Report

To seek the Board's endorsement of a preferred future funding option to support the ongoing statutory functions of the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board and the implementation and review of Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe through the 2027-2037 Long Term Plan processes of Far North District Council and Northland Regional Council.

WhakarĀpopoto matua / Executive Summary

This report outlines the Board's current funding position, projected future funding requirements, and options available to ensure the Board can continue to fulfil its statutory functions and obligations.

· Key matters include:

- The Board's current funding source originated from a $400,000 establishment grant received in 2016.

- As at May 2026, approximately $99,389.65 remained available.

- The current funding level is insufficient to undertake the statutory review of Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe required by 2030 while continuing operational and engagement activities.

· Future funding requirements include:

- statutory review of Te Rautaki;

- communications and public engagement activities;

- engagement with haukāinga;

- ongoing Board operational costs.

· Three funding options have been identified for consideration by the Board.

· Endorsement of a preferred option is required to allow partner councils to consider funding requests through their 2027-2037 Long Term Plan processes.

tŪtohunga / Recommendation

That Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board:

a) receive the report titled "Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board - Future Funding Options"; and

i) endorse Option 3: Comprehensive Funding Package as the Board's preferred funding model for consideration by Far North District Council and Northland Regional Council through their respective 2027-2037 Long Term Plan processes; and

ii) request that the Technical Advisory Group report back to the Board with recommendations on work programme approval, expenditure authorisation, monitoring and reporting processes to support future funding arrangements.

1) Tāhuhu Kōrero / Background

The Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board was established under Te Hiku Treaty Settlement legislation as a co-governance partnership between Te Hiku iwi, Far North District Council and Northland Regional Council. Its purpose is to provide governance and direction to protect and enhance the environmental, economic, social, cultural and spiritual wellbeing of Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe for present and future generations.

One of the Board's principal functions under its Terms of Reference is to prepare, monitor and review Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe (Beach Management Plan). The Beach Management Plan became operative on 25 January 2021 and must be reviewed within the timeframe prescribed by settlement legislation, requiring review by 2030.

The Board's current funding was established through an initial grant of $400,000 received in 2016 to support development of the Beach Management Plan, consultation, implementation activities and Board operations. Interest earned over the life of the fund totals approximately $41,190.

As at May 2026:

· Total cumulative expenditure was approximately $341,800.36.

· Approximately $235,058 was spent on development of Te Rautaki.

· Approximately $106,742 was spent on Board operations.

· Remaining available funds totalled approximately $99,389.65.

At its December 2025 and March 2026 meetings, the Board considered future communications and engagement requirements and directed that future funding requirements be explored for inclusion within upcoming Long Term Plan processes.

The Technical Advisory Group considered future funding requirements in July 2026 and has provided advice for Board consideration.

2) matapaki me NgĀ KŌwhiringa / Discussion and Options

Relevant legislation and/or policies

This report relates to:

· Te Hiku Treaty Settlement legislation.

· Local Government Act 2002.

· Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Terms of Reference.

· Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Standing Orders.

· Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe (Beach Management Plan).

· The Board has statutory responsibilities to monitor, implement and periodically review Te Rautaki. The proposed funding package is intended to support these obligations and the Board's ongoing governance role.

Options

Option 1 - Status Quo (Do Nothing)

Continue operating using the residual balance of the existing fund.

Advantages

· No immediate impact on council rates.

· Existing funds can be prioritised toward essential activities.

· Allows additional time to refine future funding arrangements.

Disadvantages

· Insufficient funding to complete the statutory review of Te Rautaki by 2030.

· Does not provide for communications, engagement or long-term operational sustainability.

· Does not provide certainty for future Board activities.

Option 2 - Statutory Review Only

Seek LTP funding solely for the statutory review of Te Rautaki.

Advantages

· Addresses the Board's primary statutory obligation.

· Limits the impact on councils and ratepayers.

· Allows future operational requirements to be considered separately.

Disadvantages

· Does not address communications and engagement aspirations.

· Does not provide sustainable operational funding.

· Does not support expanded engagement with haukāinga.

Option 3 - Comprehensive Funding Package (Recommended)

Seek an annual funding envelope of approximately $90,000 through the 2027-2037 Long Term Plans.

· Components would include:

- Te Rautaki review.

- Communications strategy and implementation.

- Website improvements.

- Public education and outreach.

- Haukāinga engagement.

- Operational activities and governance support.

Advantages

· Supports the statutory review requirement.

· Aligns with Board aspirations regarding communications and engagement.

· Provides operational certainty.

· Supports stronger relationships with iwi, hapū, whānau and haukāinga.

· Enables improved implementation of Te Rautaki objectives and outcomes.

Disadvantages

· Creates an ongoing funding requirement.

· Will compete against other council funding priorities.

· Requires agreement between partner councils regarding contributions, governance and reporting arrangements.

Significance and engagement

This report is considered to be of moderate significance.

While the report itself does not commit either council to expenditure, it seeks endorsement of a preferred funding proposal that may ultimately be considered through Long Term Plan consultation processes. Public engagement regarding any future funding proposal will occur through the statutory Long Term Plan processes undertaken by each council.

Policy and strategy considerations

The proposal directly supports delivery of:

· Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe.

· Treaty settlement outcomes.

· Council objectives relating to meaningful partnerships with tāngata whenua.

· Healthy waters, land and coast.

· Protection and enhancement of Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe.

The proposal is also consistent with the Board's leadership, collaboration, education and engagement objectives contained within Te Rautaki.

Risk and mitigations

Risk

Partner councils may not support the proposed funding package through their Long Term Plans.

Mitigation

Early endorsement by the Board enables councils to properly consider funding options through their LTP development process. Clear work programme governance, reporting and accountability arrangements can strengthen the proposal.

Risk

Future funding is approved but lacks sufficient governance oversight.

Mitigation

The Technical Advisory Group is proposing a revised decision-making and reporting framework to ensure accountability and transparency.

Implications for Māori

Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe holds significant cultural, spiritual and historical importance to Te Hiku iwi and forms part of Te Ara Wairua. The Board itself was established as part of Te Hiku Treaty settlement arrangements.

The proposed funding package supports:

· implementation of Treaty settlement objectives;

· ongoing iwi participation in governance;

· protection and enhancement of Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe;

· direct engagement with hapū, whānau and haukāinga;

· long-term review and implementation of Te Rautaki.

The Board includes representatives of Ngāti Kuri, Te Aupōuri, Te Rarawa and NgāiTakoto. These iwi are directly represented in the governance and decision-making processes associated with this proposal.

The Board will continue to work collaboratively with iwi, hapū and haukāinga as future work programmes and funding proposals are developed.

Costs of Each Option

Option	Estimated Cost
Option 1	Existing residual funds only
Option 2	Approximately $112,000 additional funding required to complete Te Rautaki review
Option 3	Approximately $90,000 per annum plus phased review costs through the LTP period

TAKE TŪTOHUNGA / REASON FOR THE RECOMMENDATION

Option 3 is recommended because it provides the most comprehensive and sustainable approach to supporting the Board's statutory obligations, implementation of Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe, engagement with haukāinga and ongoing governance functions. It establishes a longer-term funding pathway that reduces reliance on diminishing historic grant funding and better positions the Board to deliver its co-governance responsibilities.

3) PĀnga PŪtea me ngĀ wĀhanga tahua / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision

The proposed funding package would require a combined annual funding envelope of approximately $90,000 per annum through the 2027-2037 Long Term Plans of Far North District Council and Northland Regional Council.

Indicative future costs include:

Component	Indicative Cost
Review of Te Rautaki	Up to $150,000 (phased to 2030)
Communications Strategy and Website Review	$15,000 one-off
Communications Programme	$70,000 per annum
Haukāinga Engagement	$15,000 per annum
Operational Baseline	$5,000-$10,000 per annum

No immediate budget commitment occurs through endorsement of this report. Funding decisions remain subject to future council Long Term Plan processes.

Āpitihanga / Attachments

1. Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Board - Future Funding Options - A5877356 ⇩

Hōtaka Take Ōkawa / Compliance Schedule:

Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:

1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,

a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and

b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.

He Take Ōkawa / Compliance Requirement	Aromatawai Kaimahi / Staff Assessment
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy	Moderate significance. The report seeks endorsement of a preferred future funding option but does not commit councils to expenditure. Consultation will occur through LTP processes.
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision.	Local Government Act 2002, Te Hiku Treaty Settlement legislation, Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe Terms of Reference, Standing Orders and Te Rautaki o Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe. The proposal aligns with outcomes relating to healthy waters, protection of native biodiversity and meaningful partnerships with tāngata whenua.
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought.	The proposal relates specifically to the Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe management area and Board functions. Community Board views have not yet been sought. Any future funding proposal would be considered through district-wide Long Term Plan consultation processes.
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. State the possible implications and how this report aligns with Te Tiriti o Waitangi / The Treaty of Waitangi.	The Board is a Treaty settlement co-governance body comprising iwi and council representatives. The proposal strengthens the Board's capacity to engage with iwi, hapū, whānau and haukāinga and supports delivery of Te Rautaki.
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example – youth, the aged and those with disabilities).	Interested parties include Te Hiku Iwi, Hapū, whānau, haukāinga, Far North District Council, Northland Regional Council, beach users, local communities and stakeholders associated with Te Oneroa-a-Tōhe. Future consultation will occur through Long Term Plan processes.
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision.	Financial implications are outlined in Section 3. No budget provision is currently in place. Funding would be considered through the 2027-2037 Long Term Plan processes.
Chief Financial Officer review.	The report should be referred to the Chief Financial Officer for review through the Infocouncil review process prior to agenda publication.