Agenda of Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board Meeting

Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board Meeting Agenda

2 July 2026

The Local Government Act 2002 states the role of a Community Board is to:

A. Represent, and act as an advocate for, the interests of its community.

B. Consider and report on all matters referred to it by the territorial authority, or any matter of interest or concern to the community board.

C. Maintain an overview of services provided by the territorial authority within the community.

D. Prepare an annual submission to the territorial authority for expenditure within the community.

E. Communicate with community organisations and special interest groups within the community.

F. Undertake any other responsibilities that are delegated to it by the territorial authority

Council Delegations to Community Boards - January 2013

The "civic amenities" referred to in these delegations include the following Council activities:

· Amenity lighting

· Cemeteries

· Drainage (does not include reticulated stormwater systems)

· Footpaths/cycle ways and walkways

· Public toilets

· Reserves

· Halls

· Swimming pools

· Town litter

· Town beautification and maintenance

· Street furniture including public information signage

· Street/public Art.

· Trees on Council land

· Off road public car parks

· Lindvart Park – a Kaikohe-Hokianga Community Board civic amenity

Exclusions: From time to time Council may consider some activities and assets as having district wide significance and these will remain the responsibility of Council. These currently include: The roading network, Hundertwasser toilets, District Library Network, Baysport, the Kerikeri, Kaikohe & Kaitaia Airports, Hokianga Vehicle Ferry, i-Site network, Far North Community Centre, Kerikeri Domain, Kawakawa Heated Swimming Pool, Kaikohe Cemetery, Kerikeri Sports Complex, The Centre at Kerikeri, the Bay of Islands/Hokianga Cycle Trail.

Set local priorities for minor capital works in accordance with existing strategies,

1. Recommend local service levels and asset development priorities for civic amenities as part of the Annual Plan and Long Term Plan processes.

2. Reallocate capital budgets within the Annual Plan of up to 5% for any specific civic amenity, provided that the overall activity budgetary targets are met.

3. Make grants from the allocated Community Funds in accordance with policy 3209, and the SPARC/Sport Northland Rural Travel fund in accordance with the criteria set by the respective body, and, for the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board, the power to allocate the Hundertwasser Donations Account.

4. Provide comment to council staff on resource consent applications having significance within the Community, including the provision of land for reserves or other public purposes.

5. To hold, or participate in hearings, as the Council considers appropriate, in relation to submissions pertinent to their community made to plans and strategies including the Long Term Plan and Annual Plan, and if appropriate recommend decisions to the Council.

6. To hold hearings of submissions received as a result of Special Consultative Procedures carried out in respect of any matter other than an Annual or Long Term Plan and make recommendations to the Council.

7. Where recommended by staff to appoint management committees for local reserves, cemeteries, halls, and community centres.

8. To allocate names for previously unnamed local roads, reserves and other community facilities, and recommend to Council name changes of previously named roads, reserves, and community facilities subject to consultation with the community.

9. To consider the provisions of new and reviewed reserve management plans for recommendation to the Council in accordance with the Reserves Act 1977 and hear or participate in the hearing of submissions thereto, as considered appropriate by the Council.

10. To provide recommendations to the Council in respect of applications for the use and/or lease of reserves not contemplated by an existing reserve management plan.

11. Prohibit the use of skateboards in specified locations within their communities, in accordance with Council’s Skating Bylaw 1998.

12. Recommend new bylaws or amendments to existing bylaws.

13. Prepare and review management plans for local cemeteries within budget parameters and in a manner consistent with Council Policy.

14. Exercise the following powers in respect of the Council bylaws within their community:

a) Control of Use of Public Spaces – Dispensations on signs

b) Mobile Shops and Hawkers – Recommend places where mobile shops and/or hawkers should not be permitted.

c) Parking and Traffic Control – Recommend parking restrictions, and areas where complying camping vehicles may park, and consider and grant dispensations in accordance with clause 2007.2

d) Public Places Liquor Control – Recommend times and places where the possession or drinking of alcohol should be prohibited.

e) Speed Limits – Recommend places and speed limits which should be imposed.

15. To appoint Community Board members to speak on behalf of their community in respect of submissions or petitions.

16. Specific to the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board – consider any recommendations of the Paihia Heritage Working Group and make appropriate recommendations to Council on the development of a draft Plan Change and a Section 32 analysis on heritage provisions for Paihia.

17. To set schedule of meeting dates, times and venues, subject to the meetings not conflicting with meetings of the Council and satisfying the provisions of the Local Government Official information and Meetings Act 1987.

18. To review all proposed public art projects on a project-by project basis to ensure they comply with policy #5105 Art in Public Places, including approval of the aesthetic appearance, maintenance programme, insurance and appropriate location, and to agree to their installation.

19. In respect of applications from food establishments for permission to establish tables and chairs on a public place, i.e. Alfresco dining in accordance with Policy 3116, to consider and decide on any application which does not meet all criteria of the policy, and any application which staff recommend to be declined.

20. Subject to a report from the appropriate managers and the appropriate budgetary provision, to make decisions in respect of civic amenities including the levels of service, and the provision or removal of an amenity not provided for elsewhere in these delegations.

Terms of Reference

In fulfilling its role and giving effect to its delegations, Community Boards are expected to:

1. Comment on adverse performance to the Chief Executive in respect of service delivery.

2. Assist their communities in the development of structure plans, emergency management community response plans, and community development plans.

3. Assist their communities to set priorities for Pride of Place programmes.

4. Have special regard for the views of Māori.

5. Have special regard for the views of special interest groups, e.g. disabled, youth, aged, etc.

6. Actively participate in community consultation and advocacy and keep Council informed on local issues.

7. Seek and report to Council community feedback on current issues by:

a) Holding a Community forum prior to Board meetings

b) Varying the venues of Board meetings to enable access by members of the community

8. Monitor and make recommendations to Council to improve effectiveness of policy.

9. Appoint a member to receive Annual Plan\Long Term Council Community Plan submissions pertinent to the Board area, attend hearings within the Board area, and attend Council deliberations prior to the Plan adoption.

Protocols

In supporting Community Boards to fulfil their role, the Council will:

1. Provide appropriate management support for the Boards.

2. Organise and host regular workshops with the Community Boards l to assess the 'State of the Wards & District' to establish spending priorities.

3. Prior to decision-making, seek and include 'Community Board views' in Council reports in relation to:

a) the disposal and purchase of land

b) proposals to acquire or dispose of reserves

c) representation reviews

d) development of new maritime facilities

e) community development plans and structure plans

f) removal and protection of trees

g) local economic development initiatives

h) changes to the Resource Management Plan

4. Organise and host quarterly meetings between Boards, the CEO and senior management staff.

5. Prepare an induction/familiarisation process targeting new members in particular early in the term.

6. Support Board members to arrange meetings with local agencies and service clubs to place more emphasis on partnerships and raising profile of the Boards as community leaders.

7. Permit Board chairperson (or nominated member) speaking rights at Council meetings.

8. Help Boards to implement local community projects.

9. Arrange for Infrastructure and Asset Management Staff to meet with the Community Boards in September each year to agree the capital works for the forthcoming year for input into the Annual or Long Term Plan.

10. Provide information.

Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board Meeting Agenda

2 July 2026

6 Te Whakaaetanga o Ngā Meneti o Mua / Confirmation of Previous Minutes

6.1 Confirmation of Previous Minutes

File Number: A5822200

Author: Imrie Dunn, Democracy Advisor

Authoriser: Aisha Huriwai, Manager - Democracy Services

Take Pūrongo / Purpose of the Report

The minutes are attached to allow the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board to confirm that the minutes are a true and correct record of the previous meeting.

tŪtohunga / Recommendation

That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board confirm the minutes of the meeting held 4 June 2026 as a true and correct record.

1) TĀhuhu kŌrero / Background

Local Government Act 2002 clause 7 Section 28 states that a local authority must keep minutes of its proceedings. The minutes of these proceedings duly entered and authenticated as prescribed by a local authority are prima facie evidence of those meetings.

2) matapaki me NgĀ KŌwhiringa / Discussion and Options

The Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board Standing Orders Section 27.3 states that “no discussion may arise on the substance of the minutes at any succeeding meeting, except as to their correctness”.

TAKE TŪTOHUNGA / REASON FOR THE RECOMMENDATION

The reason for the recommendation is to confirm the minutes as a true and correct record of the previous meeting.

3) PĀnga PŪtea me ngĀ wĀhanga tahua / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision

There are no financial implications or the need for budgetary provision.

Āpitihanga / Attachments

1. 2026-06-04 Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board Minutes - A5806071 ⇩

Hōtaka Take Ōkawa / Compliance Schedule:

Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:

1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,

a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and

b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

c) If any of the options identified under paragraph (a) involves a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water, take into account the relationship of Māori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral land, water sites, waahi tapu, valued flora and fauna and other taonga.

2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.

He Take Ōkawa / Compliance Requirement	Aromatawai Kaimahi / Staff Assessment
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy	This is a matter of low significance.
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision.	This report complies with the Local Government Act 2002 Schedule 7 Section 28.
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought.	It is the responsibility of each meeting to confirm their minutes therefore the views of another meeting are not relevant.
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. State the possible implications and how this report aligns with Te Tiriti o Waitangi / The Treaty of Waitangi.	There are no implications on Māori in confirming minutes from a previous meeting. Any implications on Māori arising from matters included in meeting minutes should be considered as part of the relevant report.
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example – youth, the aged and those with disabilities).	This report is asking for the minutes to be confirmed as a true and correct record, any interest that affect other people should be considered as art of the individuals report.
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision.	There are no financial implications requiring input from the Chief Financial Officer.
Chief Financial Officer review.	The Chief Financial Officer has not reviewed this report.

Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board Meeting Agenda

2 July 2026

7 Ngā Pūrongo / Reports

7.1 New Road Name: 39 Riddell Road, Kerikeri

File Number: A5794883

Author: Trinity Lane, Finance and Customer Services Administrator

Authoriser: Margriet Veenstra, Manager - Property Information & Business Compliance

Take Pūrongo / Purpose of the Report

That Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board name five right of ways located at 39 Riddell Road, Kerikeri.

WhakarĀpopoto matua / Executive Summary

· A road naming application was submitted to name five right of ways located at 39 Riddell Road, Kerikeri.

· Community Boards have the delegated authority to allocate names for previously unnamed private roads, reserves and other community facilities.

tŪtohunga / Recommendation

That Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board name the five right of ways outlined in this report “Connemara Lane,” “Rehua Road,” “Takurua Lane,” “Tautoru Lane” and “Atutahi Lane” located at 39 Riddell Road, Kerikeri.

1) TĀhuhu kŌrero / Background

An application was received from Irina Buchanan on behalf of Taraire Tahi Limited on the 16^th of April 2026 to name five right of ways.

This development will create thirty new lots at 39 Riddell Road, Kerikeri. As per the applicant’s resource consent, due to the number of lots being created, a road name is required.

The applicant provided three preferred road names for each of the five right of ways which are outlined below.

The proposed road names were sent to Land Information New Zealand for approval. Land Information New Zealand confirmed twelve of the fifteen proposed road names are acceptable for use and can be approved as per the Addressing Standards 2011.

The applicant sought feedback from Ngāti Rēhia on their proposed road names. A response was received from Whati Rameka on behalf of Ngāti Rēhia confirming their support for the use of all the proposed road names.

2) matapaki me NgĀ KŌwhiringa / Discussion and Options

The proposed road names are as follows

Road 1

Declined by LINZ: Hope Lane – not acceptable due to Hope Avenue already in use within 13km.

Second choice: Connemara Lane – This is a breed of horse that is the applicant’s favourite.

Third Choice: Rowan Lane – This is the name of the applicant’s stallion.

Road 2

Declined by LINZ: Puanga Road – not acceptable as Puanga Lane already in use within 20km.

Second Choice: Rehua Road – A powerful god identified by a bright red star, Antares, in the Scorpio constellation.

Third choice: Waitā Road – Waitā is one of the nine stars in the Matariki cluster. This star is associated with the ocean, salt water and kai moana.

Road 3

Preferred Choice: Takurua Lane – the Māori name for Sirius, the brightest star in the night sky.

Second Choice: Tupuānuku Lane – Tupuānuku is a star in the Matariki cluster. It is the star connected to anything associated within the soil, including cultivated or uncultivated food.

Decline by LINZ: Taraire Road – not acceptable as Taraire Road is already in use within 15km.

Road 4

Preferred Choice: Tautoru Lane – The Māori name for Orion’s Belt. Consists of three bright, nearly perfectly aligned blue super giant stars.

Second Choice: Tupuārangi Lane – Tupuārangi is a star in the Matariki Cluster. It is connected to food and growth above the ground and has a strong connection with birds.

Third Choice: Waitī Lane – Waitī is a star in the Matariki Cluster. It is associated with freshwater including rivers, lakes, streams and wetlands.

Road 5

Preferred Choice: Atutahi Lane – The Māori name for Canopus (Alpha Carinae.) This star is the second brightest in the night sky.

Second Choice: Ururangi Lane – Ururangi is a star in the Matariki Cluster. This star is associated with winds, atmospheric conditions and the sky.

Third Choice: Tarata Lane – Tarata is a tree commonly known as Lemonwood.

TAKE TŪTOHUNGA / REASON FOR THE RECOMMENDATION

The road names recommended in this report are not duplicates of any other road names in the district, therefore meeting the criteria set down in the Council’s Road Naming and Property Numbering Policy and the Australian/New Zealand Addressing Standard - AS/NZS 4819.2011.

3) PĀnga PŪtea me ngĀ wĀhanga tahua / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision

There will be no financial implications to Council relating to the installation of the road name signs (blue on white background name blade). The cost of the road signage and installation will be met by the applicant.

Āpitihanga / Attachments

1. Hapu Feedback - A5794845 ⇩

2. Map - A5794844 ⇩

Hōtaka Take Ōkawa / Compliance Schedule:

Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:

1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,

a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and

b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.

He Take Ōkawa / Compliance Requirement	Aromatawai Kaimahi / Staff Assessment
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy	This is the naming of five right of ways and is of low significance.
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision.	Road Naming and Property Numbering Policy #2125 and Australia/New Zealand Urban and Rural Addressing Standards 4819.2011.
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought.	No district wide relevance and the Community Board have the delegated authority to approve road names.
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. State the possible implications and how this report aligns with Te Tiriti o Waitangi / The Treaty of Waitangi.	The applicant sought feedback from Ngāti Rēhia Hāpu on all the proposed road names. A response was received confirming their support of all the proposed road names.
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example – youth, the aged and those with disabilities).	Feedback was sought from one property who will be affected by this development. A response was received confirming their support of the road names.
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision.	There will be no financial implications to Council relating to the installation of the road name signs (blue on white background name blade). The cost of the road signage and installation will be met by the applicant.
Chief Financial Officer review.	The Chief Financial Officer as not reviewed this report.

Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board Meeting Agenda

2 July 2026

7.2 Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Proposal

File Number: A5799259

Author: Aya Morris, Net Zero & Sustainability Programme Lead

Authoriser: Kate Ivicheva, Group Manager - Planning & Policy

Take Pūrongo / Purpose of the Report

This report seeks endorsement for public electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure to be installed in off-street public carparks and in areas of parks and reserves already in use as public parking spaces within the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Ward.

WhakarĀpopoto matua / Executive Summary

· The Government’s Public EV Charging Infrastructure Loans Programme offers opportunities to improve access to public EV charging facilities in the Far North.

· The costs for installation and maintenance for this public infrastructure will be covered by private companies as recipients of the loans, with no cost to Far North District Council (FNDC).

· Many sites owned by FNDC have been identified as ideal locations for public EV charging infrastructure, and private companies wish to seek leases.

· Granting leases for the installation of public EV charging infrastructure on FNDC sites will support goals related to climate action and sustainability in FNDC’s existing strategy and policy.

tŪtohunga / Recommendation

That Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board:

a) Endorses the granting of leases for sites managed by the Far North District Council to facilitate the installation of public EV charging infrastructure in off-street public carparks and in areas of council parks and reserves that are already in use as public parking spaces.

1) TĀhuhu kŌrero / Background

The Government has recently allocated loans to two private companies to advance the extension of the nationwide EV charging network through the Public EV Charging Infrastructure Loans Programme. These two companies, ChargeNet and Meridian Energy, have each approached the FNDC to seek a strategic partnership to strengthen the EV charging network within the district.

There is presently limited access to public electric vehicle chargers within the Far North District. The PlugShare site shows 54 EV chargers in the Bay of Islands, with many of these located on the premises of private accommodation providers, and 35 EV chargers in other areas of the Far North.[1] These figures include chargers which are currently under repair.

Many areas across the Far North roading network lack public EV charging infrastructure altogether. This lack of public EV charging infrastructure acts as a disincentive for locals wishing to transition to EV use, and for EV users considering visits to the Far North.

The FNDC has previously partnered with the Northland Regional Council, Top Energy, ChargeNet, and Te Ahu Charitable Trust to advance the growth of the regional EV charging network through the Crimson Coast EV Highway project, funded through the Low Emission Vehicles Contestable Fund administered by EECA.[2]

The transition to electrification within the transport sector supports existing FNDC climate action strategy and policy around the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by communities, businesses and visitors within the Far North District.

2) matapaki me NgĀ KŌwhiringa / Discussion and Options

The installation of public electric vehicle charging infrastructure benefits Far North communities, businesses and visitors. The use of electric vehicles and hybrids is becoming increasingly common within the Far North District and within New Zealand more widely.

It is recommended that FNDC sites already in use for car parking should be considered for leases to private companies seeking to install public EV charging infrastructure for community use.

Benefits of EV charging infrastructure

The transition to electric vehicles supports nationwide greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets set out in legislation and New Zealand’s second national emissions reduction plan.[3] [4]

Emissions from transportation are the second-highest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the Northland region, after agriculture, contributing approximately 30% of regional emissions.[5]

Policy and strategy considerations

The reduction of community greenhouse gas emissions within the Far North District supports the achievement of targets set out through Far North District Council policy and strategy, including the Far North 2100 Strategy,[6] the Climate Change Roadmap,[7] and the Climate Action Policy.[8] The Far North District Council Parking Bylaw already includes instruments which relate to the management of parking spaces which feature EV charging infrastructure.[9] This bylaw would need to be amended to add additional areas if further chargers are to be installed on FNDC sites.

Risks and mitigation

The allocation of leases within parking areas located on FNDC sites may risk a reduction in the availability of parking for vehicles other than EVs. The sites recommended in Appendix A have been selected to minimise this risk.

There is some risk that sites selected for public EV charging may reduce the availability of accessible parking for people with disabilities. The sites recommended in Appendix A have been selected to minimise this risk. It is also proposed that terms should be included in lease documentation to ensure that there is no reduction in accessible parking.

Significance and engagement

The proposal does not recommend installing EV infrastructure at any sites that are not already used for car parking. It is unlikely that any negative impacts other than those noted above will result from a change of use from parking for traditional vehicles to parking for EVs.

Formal processes of public consultation and engagement have not been conducted for earlier EV infrastructure installations at FNDC sites.

Costs of each option

Both ChargeNet and Meridian Energy propose to seek 15-year leases or licences for FNDC sites, and to cover all costs toward the installation and ongoing maintenance of public electric vehicle charging infrastructure.

ChargeNet are seeking sites suitable for AC charging, informally known as slow charging. This charging method typically requires longer dwell times and produces limited revenue for providers as less electricity is consumed. ChargeNet are seeking leases free of lease fees due to this limited revenue opportunity and slower return on investment over time. They are willing to consider sites in smaller towns throughout the Far North District.

Meridian Energy are seeking sites suitable for DC charging, informally known as fast charging. This charging method offers a faster return on investment for providers. Meridian Energy are therefore seeking busier sites, located close to the state highway network, and is offering lease fees of approximately $2000 per site per year.

It is recommended that sites with central locations and higher traffic volumes are considered for Meridian Energy leases and sites with less central locations are considered for ChargeNet leases.

TAKE TŪTOHUNGA / REASON FOR THE RECOMMENDATION

The installation of public EV charging infrastructure benefits residents, businesses, and visitors to the Far North District by increasing access to public EV chargers, reducing wait times, and reducing travel distances between chargers. This increased access to EV charging incentivises domestic tourists to visit the Far North and encourages Far North residents and businesses to transition toward cleaner transportation options, supporting the Far North District Council’s community greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals.

3) PĀnga PŪtea me ngĀ wĀhanga tahua / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision

There is no requirement to allocate budget to this project, as the costs will be covered by the proposed providers of public EV charging infrastructure, ChargeNet and Meridian Energy.

There may be income opportunities available to the Far North District Council through the terms of leases and licences to occupy the selected sites.

Āpitihanga / Attachments

1. Appendix A - BWCB EV Charging Proposal - A5808126 ⇩

Hōtaka Take Ōkawa / Compliance Schedule:

Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:

1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,

a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and

b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.

He Take Ōkawa / Compliance Requirement	Aromatawai Kaimahi / Staff Assessment
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy	This report has a low degree of significance. The sites proposed for the installation of public EV infrastructure are already used as car parking spaces, so the installation of EV infrastructure is unlikely to create additional adverse effects compared with the existing car parks.
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision.	Climate Change Response (Zero Carbon) Amendment Act 2019 \| New Zealand Legislation Parking-Bylaw-Amended-February-2023.pdf Climate Change Road Map Climate Action Policy Far North 2100
State whether this issue or proposal has a District-wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought.	This issue has district wide relevance and community relevance. This is a community board report.
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. State the possible implications and how this report aligns with Te Tiriti o Waitangi / The Treaty of Waitangi.	There are implications for Māori, as improved environmental outcomes through the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions have the potential to benefit lands and waterways. The sites proposed for the installation of public EV infrastructure are already in use as car parking spaces, so the installation of EV infrastructure is unlikely to create additional adverse effects for Māori in comparison to the existing car parks.
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example – youth, the aged and those with disabilities).	People with disabilities or the aged community may be impacted if there is any reduction in the availability of accessible car parking. The project will ensure that no accessible car parks are removed and will ensure that new accessible car parks are created, as EV users also have needs for accessible parking.
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision.	This has been covered in Section 3. There are no budget allocation requirements for this project, as the installation of public EV charging infrastructure will be covered by the proposed providers: ChargeNet and Meridian Energy. There may be opportunities for income generation through the terms of the leases and licences to occupy which will be granted.
Chief Financial Officer review.	The Chief Financial Officer as not reviewed this report.

Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board Meeting Agenda

2 July 2026

7.3 Project Funding Reports

File Number: A5826995

Author: Kathryn Trewin, Funding Advisor

Authoriser: Aisha Huriwai, Manager - Democracy Services

Take Pūrongo / Purpose of the Report

Recipients of funds from the Community Board’s Local Grant Fund must complete and submit a project report no later than two months after the completion of their project.

tŪtohunga / Recommendation

That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board note the project reports received from:

a) ArtsXL Trust – 100x100

1) TĀhuhu kŌrero / Background

Clause 15 of the Community Grant Policy states that: “At the completion of a project that received community funding, recipients are required to complete a Project Report. These reports must be received no later than two months after the completion of the project, or, if the activity is ongoing, within two months of the funding being spent. Recipients who do not complete this form are ineligible for Council funding for a period of five years.”

2) matapaki me NgĀ KŌwhiringa / Discussion and Options

Copies of the project reports are attached for the Board’s information. Should Board members have concerns or issues with these reports, these should be discussed at this part of the meeting.

Take Tūtohunga / Reason for the recommendation

To receive the project reports from funding applicants in accordance with the Community Grant Policy.

3) PĀnga PŪtea me ngĀ wĀhanga tahua / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision

There are no financial implications or budgetary requirements.

Āpitihanga / Attachments

1. ArtsXL - 100 x 100 - A5826985 ⇩

Hōtaka Take Ōkawa / Compliance Schedule:

Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:

1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process:

a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and

b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.

He Take Ōkawa / Compliance Requirement	Aromatawai Kaimahi / Staff Assessment
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy	This is a matter of low significance.
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision.	Community Grant Policy.
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought.	This report does not have district-wide relevance.
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. State the possible implications and how this report aligns with Te Tiriti o Waitangi / The Treaty of Waitangi.	No implications for Māori in relation to land and/or water.
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example – youth, the aged and those with disabilities).	Considered in the application.
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision.	Budgetary Provision has been made, and the grant is allocated in accordance with the Community Grant Policy.
Chief Financial Officer review.	The Chief Financial Officer has not reviewed this report.

Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board Meeting Agenda

2 July 2026

7.4 Funding Applications

File Number: A5827013

Author: Kathryn Trewin, Funding Advisor

Authoriser: Aisha Huriwai, Manager - Democracy Services

Take Pūrongo / Purpose of the Report

The purpose of this report is to allow the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board (the Board) to consider the application/s received for the Community Grant Fund/Placemaking Fund.

WhakarĀpopoto matua / Executive Summary

· There are nine new applications requesting $74,070.

· A request has also been received from a previous applicant to use the funds granted for a different purpose, and an application that was partly funded in the previous financial year is returned for the Board to decide if they would like to fund the remainder in this financial year.

· At the time this report was written, the 2026/27 Annual Plan has not been adopted, so funding has not been confirmed. This is due to take place on 25 June 2026. Funding is expected to be similar or the same to the 2025/26 financial year – Community Grant funding of $208,804 and Pride of Place funding of $100,000.

TŪTOHUNGA / RECOMMENDATION

a) That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board approve the sum of $5,000 (plus GST if applicable) be paid from the Board’s Community Grant Fund account to Youthline Auckland Charitable Trust for costs towards Helpline support costs.

TŪTOHUNGA / RECOMMENDATION

b) That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board approve the sum of $5,000 (plus GST if applicable) be paid from the Board’s Community Grant Fund account to Within Nature for costs towards Regenerative Learning Hub in Kawakawa.

TŪTOHUNGA / RECOMMENDATION

c) That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board approve the sum of $3,790 (plus GST if applicable) be paid from the Board’s Pride of Place Grant Fund account to Whangaroa Health Services Trust for costs towards two portable AED units

TŪTOHUNGA / RECOMMENDATION

d) That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board approve the sum of $5,000 (plus GST if applicable) be paid from the Board’s Community Grant Fund account to Te Tai Tokerau Tarai Waka Inc for costs towards Te Hau Kōmaru Festival 2026: Te Hekenga Mai.

TŪTOHUNGA / RECOMMENDATION

e) That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board approve the sum of $5,000 (plus GST if applicable) be paid from the Board’s Community Grant Fund account to Splashsave Foundation for costs towards Wai Ora Far North at Kawakawa

TŪTOHUNGA / RECOMMENDATION

f) That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board approve the sum of $4,000 (plus GST if applicable) be paid from the Board’s Community Grant Fund account to R. Tucker Thompson Sail Training Trust for costs towards youth sailing voyages.

TŪTOHUNGA / RECOMMENDATION

g) That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board approve the sum of $5,000 (plus GST if applicable) be paid from the Board’s Community Grant Fund account to Little Dippers Swim School and Aquatic Centre for costs towards BlueMind Hydrotherapy.

TŪTOHUNGA / RECOMMENDATION

h) That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board approve the sum of $100 (plus GST if applicable) be paid from the Board’s Community Grant Fund account to Kerikeri Golf Club for costs towards Matariki Mixed Pairs Tournament

TŪTOHUNGA / RECOMMENDATION

i) That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board approve the sum of $5,210 (plus GST if applicable) be paid from the Board’s Community Grant Fund account to Hospice Mid-Northland for costs towards Adjustable Medical Beds and Extenders.

TŪTOHUNGA / RECOMMENDATION

j) That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board allow Te Kōhanga Reo ō Taurangi to use the $7,500 granted in September 2025 to be used towards shade-sails over the playground instead of construction of a new playground.

TŪTOHUNGA / RECOMMENDATION

k) That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board approve the sum of $10,000 (plus GST if applicable) be paid from the Board’s Community Grant Fund account to The Turner Centre for costs towards Mardi Gras 2027, in addition to the $6,854 (plus GST if applicable) granted at the June 2026 meeting of the previous financial year.

1) TĀhuhu kŌrero / Background

Each application has been checked by staff for completeness and complies with the conditions of the Community Grant Policy, Community Outcomes as stated in the Long-Term Plan and all provisions listed on the application form.

Each application must meet at least one community outcome from the Council’s Long-Term Plan. The six community outcomes are as follows:

1. A wisely managed and treasured environment that recognises the role of tangata whenua as kaitiaki;

2. We embrace and celebrate our unique culture and heritage and value it as a source of enduring pride;

3. Proud, vibrant communities;

4. Prosperous Communities supported by a sustainable economy;

5. Communities that are safe, connected and sustainable;

6. Communities that are prepared for the unexpected.

2) matapaki me NgĀ KŌwhiringa / Discussion and Options

Applicant	Requested	Recommend	Comments
a) Youthline Auckland Charitable Trust – Helpline support costs	$12,500	$5,000	The applicant is seeking funding towards the costs of providing Youthline services to youths in the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa ward. They have made similar applications to the other boards. They have previously received funding in 2021 ($3,000) and 2025 ($5,000) This meets community outcomes 2,3,5,6
b) Within Nature – Regenerative Learning Hub in Kawakawa	$20,000	$5,000	The applicant is seeking funding towards a learning hub based in Kawakawa. They previously received funding for mentors in 2025 ($10,000). They have submitted a project report for that form that will come to the next Board meeting. This meets community outcomes 1,2,3,5,6
c) Whangaroa Health Services Trust – 2 portable AED units	$3,790	$3,790	The applicant is seeking funding towards providing two portable AED units for their outreach teams, who provide healthcare to isolated patients in the area. The applicant has previously received funds for fitness equipment for the community gym ($1739, 2020) and a community garden ($1548, 2025) This meets community outcomes 2,3,5,6
d) Te Tai Tokerau Tarai Waka Inc - Te Hau Kōmaru Festival 2026: Te Hekenga Mai	$5,000	$5,000	The applicant is seeking funding towards the 2026 Te Hau Kōmaru Festival, which is expected to involve over 1000 tamariki/rangatahi from across the Far North District. They have made similar applications to the other boards. This meets community outcomes 2,3,5
e) Splashsave Foundation – Wai Ora Far North	$12,570	$5,000	The applicant is planning on running water safety courses across the district and has made similar applications to the other boards. This application is specifically for classes that are to be held in Kawakawa. This meets community outcomes 2,3,5,6
f) R. Tucker Thompson Sail Training Trust – Youth sailing voyages	$4,000	$4,000	The applicant applies each year for funding for two Bay of Islands-Whangaroa rangatahi to attend youth sailing voyages on the R Tucker Thompson. They have been granted $4,000 per year for the past five years. This meets community outcomes 2,3,5,6
g) Little Dippers Swim School and Aquatic Centre – BlueMind Hydrotherapy	$9,000	$5,000	The applicant seeking funding from the Board towards running hydrotherapy classes for those with Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, brain injuries/neurological conditions and neurodivergent adults and children. They previously received funding for water safety campaign equipment in 2022 ($3,478). This meets community outcomes 2,3,5
h) Kerikeri Golf Club – Matariki Mixed Pairs Tournament	$2,000	$100	The applicant is seeking funding for a mixed pairs golf tournament to be held during Matariki. The application is for advertising, food and prizes. Prizes are specifically excluded under the Community Grant Policy and the Board have previously indicated they are unlikely to fund kai, except in extenuating circumstances. The amount recommended is for advertising, although no quote has been provided. This meets community outcomes 2,3,4,5
i) Hospice Mid-Northland – Adjustable Medical Beds and Extenders	$12,872	$5,210	The applicant is seeking funding towards adjustable medical beds and extenders for use within the wider ward. They were granted $6,000 in July 2025. That project report is overdue. The team at Hospice have completely changed since that application was made and they are working on the report now. This meets community outcomes 2,3,5,6
j) Te Kōhanga Reo ō Taurangi	$7,500	No additional funding required	The applicant was granted $7,500 towards Papa Tākaro Playground Redevelopment in September 2025. The project has continued to evolve, and the applicant has come back to the board to request that they instead be allowed to use the funding towards the cost of installing shadesails over the existing playground instead. This meets community outcomes 2,3,5,6
k) Turner Centre - Mardi Gras at the Turner Centre	$20,000. Granted $6,854. Balance of request $13,146	$10,000	The applicant applied for $20,000 for this festival at the June 2026 meeting. They were granted the balance of funds the Board had remaining at the end of the financial year. The application is returned to the Board for them to consider if they would like to grant the remaining requested amount This meets community outcomes 2,3,5

Take Tūtohunga / Reason for the recommendation

The applicants were required to complete a standard application form and provide supporting information.

For each application, the Board has three options.

Option One: Authorise funding for the full amount requested.

Option Two: Authorise partial funding.

Option Three: Decline funding the application.

3) PĀnga PŪtea me ngĀ wĀhanga tahua / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision

Budgetary provision has been made, and the grant is allocated in accordance with the Community Grant Policy.

Āpitihanga / Attachments

1. Summary of Funding Applications - July 2026 - A5828631 ⇩

Hōtaka Take Ōkawa / Compliance Schedule:

Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:

1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,

a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and

b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and

2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.

He Take Ōkawa / Compliance Requirement	Aromatawai Kaimahi / Staff Assessment
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy	This is a matter of low significance.
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision.	Applications received are assessed against the Community Grants Policy and Te Pae o Uta.
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought.	This report does not have district wide relevance.
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. State the possible implications and how this report aligns with Te Tiriti o Waitangi / The Treaty of Waitangi.	There are no implications for Māori in relation to the applications received in relation to whenua and/or wai.
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example – youth, the aged and those with disabilities).	Considered in the application.
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision.	Budgetary provision has been made, and the grant is allocated in accordance with the Community Grant Policy.
Chief Financial Officer review.	The Chief Financial Officer has not reviewed this report.

Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board Meeting Agenda

2 July 2026

8 Ngā Pūrongo Taipitopito / Information Reports

8.1 2025 - 26 End of Year Funding Report

File Number: A5826836

Author: Kathryn Trewin, Funding Advisor

Authoriser: Aisha Huriwai, Manager - Democracy Services

TAKE PŪRONGO / Purpose of the Report

This report provides the Board with an overview of the funding applications and decisions made in the 2025-26 financial year. It is noted that this does not include the applications and decisions received and made at the meeting on 29 June 2026.

WHAKARĀPOPOTO MATUA / Executive SummarY

· The Board considered 58 applications in the 2025-26 financial year.

· Applications were broadly classified into six categories, with Events projects being most received.

· It is noted there was a drop in applications in the lead up to (and after) the local body elections in October 2025.

TŪTOHUNGA / Recommendation

That the Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Community Board receive the report 2025 - 26 End of Year Funding Report.

tĀHUHU KŌRERO / Background

Each year, the Funding Advisor receives and processes funding applications for the Board to help them make decisions on what community applicants receive funding for their projects. This report provides the Board with information about their decisions in the 2025-26 financial year.

At the start of the 2025-26 financial year, the Board had $100,000 allocated for Pride of Place funding and $208,804 for Community Grant funding.

The $208,804 is generated from rates specifically collected within Bay of Islands-Whangaroa Ward.

MATAPAKI ME NGĀ KŌWHIRINGA / Discussion and Next Steps

During the year, 58 applications for funding were received. It is noted that with the local body elections taking place in late 2025, this affected the number of applications received. No applications were considered in October (the month of the elections), January (when no meeting was held) and February (when no new applications were received for consideration).

Applications received were considered in six categories: Art/Culture/Heritage, Community, Environmental, Event, Infrastructure and Sport/Recreation. As in previous years, the bulk of applications are received for projects classified as Events (25).

Each year, the amount of funding requested is substantially more than the amount of funding the Board has available to grant.

The Events and Community sectors of funding applications are the largest requesters of funding, although Infrastructure, which is typically larger projects involving construction, has a high monetary value.

Being the main urban centre in the ward, Kerikeri is the base of the bulk of applications, with Paihia close behind as a host of many events, but they have been received from across the rest of the ward, as well as applications that are for the benefit of the wider ward and/or district, rather than just centralised in one community.