Te Kaunihera o Tai Tokerau ki te Raki
AGENDA
Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Meeting
Wednesday, 24 March 2021
Time: |
1.00 pm |
Location: |
Council Chamber Memorial Avenue Kaikohe |
Membership:
Cr John Vujcich - Chairperson
Bruce Robertson – Deputy Chairperson
Mayor John Carter
Deputy Mayor Ann Court
Cr Mate Radich
Cr Rachel Smith
Cr Kelly Stratford
Cr Moko Tepania
Kaikohe-Hokianga Community Board Chairperson Mike Edmonds
|
Authorising Body |
Mayor/Council |
Status |
Standing Committee |
|
COUNCIL COMMITTEE |
Title |
Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Terms of Reference |
Approval Date |
19 December 2019 |
|
Responsible Officer |
Chief Executive |
Purpose
The purpose of the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee (the Committee) is to assist and advise the Governing Body in discharging its responsibility and ownership of finance, risk and internal control.
The Committee will review the effectiveness of the following aspects:
· The robustness of financial management practices;
· The integrity and appropriateness of internal and external reports and accountability arrangements;
· The robustness of the risk management framework;
· The robustness of internal controls and the internal audit framework;
· Compliance with applicable laws, regulations, standards and best practice guidelines;
· The establishment and maintenance of controls to safeguard the Council’s financial and non-financial assets;
· Data governance framework
To perform his or her role effectively, each Committee member must develop and maintain
his or her skills and knowledge, including an understanding of the Committee’s responsibilities, and of the Council’s business, operations and risks.
Membership
The Council will determine the membership of the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee including at least one independent appointment with suitable financial and risk management knowledge and experience.
The Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee will comprise of at least five elected members (one of which will be the chairperson), and one independent appointed member.
Mayor Carter |
John Vujcich – Chairperson |
Bruce Robertson – Deputy Chairperson and Independent Member of the Committee |
Moko Tepania |
Mate Radich |
Rachel Smith |
Kelly Stratford |
Ann Court |
Mike Edmonds |
Adele Gardner |
Non-appointed councillors may attend meetings with speaking rights, but not voting rights.
Quorum
The quorum at a meeting of the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee is 4 members.
Frequency of Meetings
The Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee shall meet every 6 weeks, but may be cancelled if there is no business.
Power to Delegate
The Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee may not delegate any of its responsibilities, duties or powers.
Committees Responsibilities
The Committees responsibilities are described below:
Financial systems and performance of the Council
· Review the Council’s financial and non-financial performance against the Long Term Plan and Annual Plan
· Review Council quarterly financial statements and draft Annual Report
Far North Holdings Limited (FNHL)
· Recommend to Council the approval of statement of intent and Annual Report (s67 LGA)
· Receive 6 monthly report on operations (s66 LGA)
· Receive quarterly financial statements
· Recommend appointment of directors of FNHL
Risk Management
· Review appropriateness of Council’s risk management framework and associated procedures for effective risk identification, evaluation and treatment
· Receive and review risk management dashboard reports
· Provide input, annually, into the setting of the risk management programme of work
· Receive updates on current litigation and legal liabilities
Internal Audit and Controls
· Review whether management has in place a current and comprehensive internal audit framework
· Receive and review the internal audit dashboard reports
· Provide input, annually, into the setting of the internal audit programme of work
· Review whether there are appropriate processes and systems in place to identify and investigate fraudulent behaviour
The Committee will manage Council’s relationship with external auditor.
The Committee will approve applications to declare land abandoned and any other such matters under the Rating Act.
Rules and Procedures
Council’s Standing Orders and Code of Conduct apply to all the committee’s meetings.
The Chair of the Committee will submit a written report to the Chief Executive on an annual basis. The review will summarise the activities of the Committee and how it has contributed to the Council’s governance and strategic objectives. The Chief Executive will place the report on the next available agenda of the governing body.
ASSURANCE, RISK AND FINANCE COMMITTEE - MEMBERS REGISTER OF INTERESTS
Name |
Responsibility (i.e. Chairperson etc) |
Declaration of Interests |
Nature of Potential Interest |
Member's Proposed Management Plan |
Hon John Carter QSO |
Board Member of the Local Government Protection Programme |
Board Member of the Local Government Protection Program |
|
|
Carter Family Trust |
|
|
|
|
John Vujcich (Chair) |
Board Member |
Pioneer Village |
Matters relating to funding and assets |
Declare interest and abstain |
Director |
Waitukupata Forest Ltd |
Potential for council activity to directly affect its assets |
Declare interest and abstain |
|
Director |
Rural Service Solutions Ltd |
Matters where council regulatory function impact of company services |
Declare interest and abstain |
|
Director |
Kaikohe (Rau Marama) Community Trust |
Potential funder |
Declare interest and abstain |
|
Partner |
MJ & EMJ Vujcich |
Matters where council regulatory function impacts on partnership owned assets |
Declare interest and abstain |
|
Member |
Kaikohe Rotary Club |
Potential funder, or impact on Rotary projects |
Declare interest and abstain |
|
Member |
New Zealand Institute of Directors |
Potential provider of training to Council |
Declare a Conflict of Interest |
|
Member |
Institute of IT Professionals |
Unlikely, but possible provider of services to Council |
Declare a Conflict of Interest |
|
Bruce Robertson (Deputy) |
Chair/Deputy Chair of a number of Audit and Risk Committees: Far North Auckland Bay of Plenty Regional Tauranga Thames Coromandel Hamilton Waipa Otorohanga Waitomo Environment Southland Invercargill Southland. |
|
There is a low level of there being a potential interest conflict. An outside potential is water reform and ‘discussion’ of one north regional water company in loving North AKD with Watercare. |
I remain aware of my roiled and will Raise any matter with the Mayor/CEO And chair of ARF should any matter potentially conflict. |
|
Currently None are North AKD. Previously I have Undertaken work on Okara Park with Whangarei DC. |
Advisory Work. |
Okara Park is a regional Stadium. Matter solely related Governance and role of DC. Low risk of conflict. |
|
Deputy Mayor Ann Court |
Waipapa Business Association |
Member |
|
Case by case |
Warren Pattinson Limited |
Shareholder |
Building company. FNDC is a regulator and enforcer |
Case by case |
|
Kerikeri Irrigation |
Supplies my water |
|
No |
|
Top Energy |
Supplies my power |
|
No other interest greater than the publics |
|
District Licensing |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Top Energy Consumer Trust |
Trustee |
Crossover in regulatory functions, consenting economic development and contracts such as street lighting. |
Declare interest and abstain from voting. |
|
Ann Court Trust |
Private |
Private |
N/A |
|
Waipapa Rotary |
Honorary member |
Potential community funding submitter |
Declare interest and abstain from voting. |
|
Properties on Onekura Road, Waipapa |
Owner Shareholder |
Any proposed FNDC Capital works or policy change which may have a direct impact (positive/adverse) |
Declare interest and abstain from voting. |
|
Property on Daroux Dr, Waipapa |
Financial interest |
Any proposed FNDC Capital works or policy change which may have a direct impact (positive/adverse) |
Declare interest and abstain from voting. |
|
Flowers and gifts |
Ratepayer 'Thankyou' |
Bias/ Pre-determination? |
Declare to Governance |
|
Coffee and food |
Ratepayers sometimes 'shout' food and beverage |
Bias or pre-determination |
Case by case |
|
Staff |
N/A |
Suggestion of not being impartial or pre-determined! |
Be professional, due diligence, weigh the evidence. Be thorough, thoughtful, considered impartial and balanced. Be fair. |
|
Warren Pattinson |
My husband is a builder and may do work for Council staff |
|
Case by case |
|
Ann Court - Partner |
Warren Pattinson Limited |
Director |
Building Company. FNDC is a regulator |
Remain at arm’s length |
Air NZ |
Shareholder |
None |
None |
|
Warren Pattinson Limited |
Builder |
FNDC is the consent authority, regulator and enforcer. |
Apply arm’s length rules |
|
Property on Onekura Road, Waipapa |
Owner |
Any proposed FNDC capital work in the vicinity or rural plan change. Maybe a link to policy development. |
Would not submit. Rest on a case by case basis. |
|
Mate Radich |
No form received |
|
|
|
Kelly Stratford |
KS Bookkeeping and Administration |
Business Owner, provides book keeping, administration and development of environmental management plans |
None perceived |
Step aside from decisions that arise, that may have conflicts |
Waikare Marae Trustees |
Trustee |
Maybe perceived conflicts |
Case by case basis |
|
Bay of Islands College |
Parent Elected Trustee |
None perceived |
If there was a conflict, I will step aside from decision making |
|
Karetu School |
Parent Elected Trustee |
None perceived |
If there was a conflict, I will step aside from decision making |
|
Māori title land – Moerewa and Waikare |
Beneficiary and husband is a shareholder |
None perceived |
If there was a conflict, I will step aside from decision making |
|
Sister is employed by Far North District Council |
|
|
Will not discuss work/governance mattes that are confidential |
|
Gifts - food and beverages |
Residents and ratepayers may ‘shout’ food and beverage |
Perceived bias or predetermination |
Case by case basis |
|
Taumarere Counselling Services |
Advisory Board Member |
May be perceived conflicts |
Should conflict arise, step aside from voting |
|
Sport Northland |
Board Member |
May be perceived conflicts |
Should conflict arise, step aside from voting |
|
Kelly Stratford - Partner |
Chef and Barista |
Opua Store |
None perceived |
|
Māori title land – Moerewa |
Shareholder |
None perceived |
If there was a conflict of interest, I would step aside from decision making |
|
Rachel Smith |
Friends of Rolands Wood Charitable Trust |
Trustee |
|
|
Mid North Family Support |
Trustee |
|
|
|
Property Owner |
Kerikeri |
|
|
|
Friends who work at Far North District Council |
|
|
|
|
Kerikeri Cruising Club |
Subscription Member |
|
|
|
Rachel Smith (Partner) |
Property Owner |
Kerikeri |
|
|
Friends who work at Far North District Council |
|
|
|
|
Kerikeri Cruising Club |
Subscription Member and Treasurer |
|
|
|
Moko Tepania |
Teacher |
Te Kura Kaupapa Māori o Kaikohe. |
Potential Council funding that will benefit my place of employment. |
Declare a perceived conflict |
Chairperson |
Te Reo o Te Tai Tokerau Trust. |
Potential Council funding for events that this trust runs. |
Declare a perceived conflict |
|
Tribal Member |
Te Rūnanga o Te Rarawa |
As a descendent of Te Rarawa I could have a perceived conflict of interest in Te Rarawa Council relations. |
Declare a perceived conflict |
|
Tribal Member |
Te Rūnanga o Whaingaroa |
As a descendent of Te Rūnanga o Whaingaroa I could have a perceived conflict of interest in Te Rūnanga o Whaingaroa Council relations. |
Declare a perceived conflict |
|
Tribal Member |
Kahukuraariki Trust Board |
As a descendent of Kahukuraariki Trust Board I could have a perceived conflict of interest in Kahukuraariki Trust Board Council relations. |
Declare a perceived conflict |
|
Tribal Member |
Te Rūnanga ā-Iwi o Ngāpuhi |
As a descendent of Te Rūnanga ā-Iwi o Ngāpuhi I could have a perceived conflict of interest in Te Rūnanga ā-Iwi o Ngāpuhi Council relations. |
Declare a perceived conflict |
|
Mike Edmonds |
Chair |
Kaikohe Mechanical and Historic Trust |
Council Funding |
Decide at the time |
Committee member |
Kaikohe Rugby Football and Sports Club |
Council Funding |
Withdraw and abstain |
Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Meeting Agenda |
24 March 2021 |
Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Meeting
will be held in the Council Chamber, Memorial Avenue, Kaikohe on:
Wednesday 24 March 2021 at 1.00 pm
Order Of Business / Te Paeroa Mahi
1 Karakia Timatanga – Opening Prayer
2 Apologies and Declarations of Interest
4 Confirmation of Previous Minutes
4.1 Confirmation of Previous Minutes
6.1 Council Financial Report for the Period Ending 28 February 2021
6.2 Risk Progress Report for Programme of Externally Funded Projects
6.4 Elected Member Sensitive Expenditure
7.1 Confirmation of Previous Minutes
7.2 Internal Audit and Assurance Program 2021
8 Karakia Whakamutunga – Closing Prayer
2 Apologies and Declarations of Interest
Members need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as a Member of the Committee and any private or other external interest they might have. This note is provided as a reminder to Members to review the matters on the agenda and assess and identify where they may have a pecuniary or other conflict of interest, or where there may be a perception of a conflict of interest.
If a Member feels they do have a conflict of interest, they should publicly declare that at the start of the meeting or of the relevant item of business and refrain from participating in the discussion or voting on that item. If a Member thinks they may have a conflict of interest, they can seek advice from the Chief Executive Officer or the Team Leader Democracy Support (preferably before the meeting).
It is noted that while members can seek advice the final decision as to whether a conflict exists rests with the member.
No requests for deputations were received at the time of the Agenda going to print.
24 March 2021 |
4 Confirmation of Previous Minutes
4.1 Confirmation of Previous Minutes
File Number: A3110035
Author: Casey Gannon, Meetings Administrator
Authoriser: Aisha Huriwai, Team Leader Democracy Services
Te Take Pūrongo / Purpose of the Report
The minutes are attached to allow the Committee to confirm that the minutes are a true and correct record of previous meetings.
1) te TĀhuhu kŌrero / Background
Local Government Act 2002 Schedule 7 Section 28 states that a local authority must keep minutes of its proceedings. The minutes of these proceedings duly entered and authenticated as prescribed by a local authority are prima facie evidence of those meetings.
2) Te matapaki me NgĀ KŌwhiringa / Discussion and Options
The minutes of the meetings are attached.
Far North District Council Standing Orders Section 27.3 states that no discussion shall arise on the substance of the minutes in any succeeding meeting, except as to their correctness.
Te Take Tūtohunga / Reason for the recommendation
The reason for the recommendation is to confirm the minutes are a true and correct record of the previous meetings.
3) NgĀ PĀnga PŪtea me ngĀ wĀhanga tahua / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision
There are no financial implications or the need for budgetary provision as a result of this report.
1. 2021-02-10
Assurance, Risk and Finance Committe Minutes - A3080730 ⇩
Te Hōtaka Take Ōkawa / Compliance schedule:
Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:
1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,
a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and
b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and
c) If any of the options identified under paragraph (a) involves a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water, take into account the relationship of Māori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral land, water sites, waahi tapu, valued flora and fauna and other taonga.
2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.
He Take Ōkawa / Compliance requirement |
Te Aromatawai Kaimahi / Staff assessment |
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy |
This is a matter of low significance. |
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision. |
This report complies with the Local Government Act 2002 Schedule 7 Section 28. |
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought. |
It is the responsibility of each meeting to confirm their minutes therefore the views of another meeting are not relevant. |
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. |
There are no implications on Māori in confirming minutes from a previous meeting. Any implications on Māori arising from matters included in meeting minutes should be considered as part of the relevant report. |
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example – youth, the aged and those with disabilities). |
This report is asking for the minutes to be confirmed as true and correct record, any interests that affect other people should be considered as part of the individual reports. |
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision. |
There are no financial implications or the need for budgetary provision arising from this report. |
Chief Financial Officer review. |
The Chief Financial Officer has not reviewed this report. |
Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Meeting Agenda |
24 March 2021 |
MINUTES OF Far North District Council
Assurance, Risk and
Finance Committee Meeting
HELD AT THE Council
Chamber, Memorial Avenue, Kaikohe
ON Wednesday, 10
February 2021 AT 1.00 pm
PRESENT: Cr John Vujcich, Member Bruce Robertson, Cr Rachel Smith, Cr Kelly Stratford, Kaikohe-Hokianga Community Board Chairperson Mike Edmonds
IN ATTENDANCE: Janice Smith (General Manager Corporate Services - Acting), William J Taylor, MBE (General Manager Strategic Planning and Policy - Acting), Andy Finch (General Manager Infrastructure and Asset Management), Dean Myburgh (General Manager District Services)
1 Karakia TimatAnga – Opening Prayer
Chair John Vujcich started the meeting with a karakia.
2 Apologies and Declarations of Interest |
Resolution 2021/1 Moved: Cr John Vujcich Seconded: Member Bruce Robertson That the apologies from His Worship the Mayor John Carter, Deputy Mayor Ann Court, Councillor Moko Tepania be accepted. Carried |
No deputations for this meeting.
4 Confirmation of Previous Minutes
4.1 Confirmation of Previous Minutes Agenda item 4.1 document number A3051523, pages 12 - 18 refers. |
Resolution 2021/2 Moved: Cr John Vujcich Seconded: Member Bruce Robertson Recommendation That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee confirms the minutes of the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee meeting held 2 December 2020 as a true and correct record. Carried |
5.1 Update of Policy - Appointment of Directors to Council Organisations Agenda item 5.1 document number A3058464, pages 19 - 23 refers. |
Recommendation Moved: Cr John Vujcich Seconded: Cr Kelly Stratford That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee recommend to Council that the updated Policy 2117 – Appointment and Remuneration of Directors for Council Organisations be approved. AMENDMENT Moved: Cr John Vujcich Seconded: Member Bruce Robertson That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee recommend to Council: a) the updated Policy 2117 – Appointment and Remuneration of Directors for Council Organisations be approved, subject to; b) the Chair of Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee and Chair of Strategy and Policy Committee have delegated authority to approve the amendments on an updated policy. The amendment became the substantive motion. MOTION 2021/3 Moved: Cr John Vujcich Seconded: Member Bruce Robertson That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee recommend to Council: a) the updated Policy 2117 – Appointment and Remuneration of Directors for Council Organisations be approved, subject to; b) the Chair of Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee and Chair of Strategy and Policy Committee have delegated authority to approve the amendments on an updated policy. Carried |
Agenda item 5.2 document number A3047645, pages 24 - 27 refers. |
Resolution 2021/4 Moved: Cr Kelly Stratford Seconded: Cr Rachel Smith That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee approves the removal of ARF002 Building Consents – BCA status risk from the organisational risk dashboard. Carried |
6.1 February 2021 Risk Management Report Agenda item 6.1 document number A3053831, pages 28 - 41 refers. |
Resolution 2021/5 Moved: Cr Kelly Stratford Seconded: Member Bruce Robertson That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee receive the report February 2021 Risk Management Report. Carried |
6.2 2021-02-10 Revenue Recovery report Agenda item 6.2 document number A3067425, pages 42 - 47 refers. |
Resolution 2021/6 Moved: Cr Kelly Stratford Seconded: Member Bruce Robertson That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee receive the report 2021-02-10 Revenue Recovery report 2021-02-10. Carried |
At 2:03 pm, Cr Kelly Stratford left the meeting.
At 2:05 pm, Cr Kelly Stratford returned to the meeting.
6.3 Elected Member Sensitive Expenditure Agenda item 6.3 document number A3014973, pages 48 - 49 refers. |
Resolution 2021/7 Moved: Kaikohe-Hokianga Community Board Chairperson Mike Edmonds Seconded: Member Bruce Robertson That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee receive the report Elected Member Sensitive Expenditure. Carried |
6.4 Level of Service KPI Quarter 2 Performance Report Agenda item 6.4 document number A3066072, pages 50 - 72 refers. |
Resolution 2021/8 Moved: Member Bruce Robertson Seconded: Cr Kelly Stratford That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee receive the report Level of Service KPI Quarter 2 Performance Report. Carried |
6.5 Digital Information Services - 2021 Work Programme Agenda item 6.5 document number A3059539, pages 73 - 76 refers. |
Recommendation Moved: Cr Kelly Stratford Seconded: Cr Rachel Smith That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee receive the report Digital Information Services - 2021 Work Programme. Carried |
At 2:48 pm, Kaikohe-Hokianga Community Board Chairperson Mike Edmonds left the meeting.
At 2:50 pm, Kaikohe-Hokianga Community Board Chairperson Mike Edmonds returned to the meeting.
6.6 Sustainable Procurement Update Agenda item 6.6 document number A3062233, pages 77 - 78 refers. |
Resolution 2021/9 Moved: Cr John Vujcich Seconded: Member Bruce Robertson That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee receive the report Sustainable Procurement Update. Carried |
6.7 Tender Panel Quarterly Information Report September - December 2020 Agenda item 6.7 document number A3063064, pages 79 - 85 refers. |
Resolution 2021/10 Moved: Member Bruce Robertson Seconded: Cr John Vujcich That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee receive the report Tender Panel Quarterly Information Report. Carried |
7.0 RESOLUTION TO EXCLUDE THE PUBLIC |
|||||||||
Resolution 2020/11 Moved: Cr John Vujcich Seconded: Member Bruce Robertson That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting. The general subject matter of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48 of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
Abstained: Cr Rachel Smith Carried |
7.1 CONFIRMATION OF INFORMATION AND DECISIONS IN OPEN MEETING |
Resolution 2021/12 Moved: Cr John Vujcich Seconded: Cr Kelly Stratford That Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee confirm that the information and decisions contained in the part of the meeting held with the public excluded is not to be restated in public meeting. Abstained: Cr Rachel Smith Carried |
7.2 RESOLUTION TO READMIT THE PUBLIC |
Recommendation 2021/13 Moved: Cr John Vujcich Seconded: Cr Kelly Stratford That Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee readmit the public. Abstained: Cr Rachel Smith Carried |
At 3:45 pm, Cr Rachel Smith returned to the meeting.
8 Karakia Whakamutunga – Closing Prayer
Cr. Kelly Stratford closed the meeting with a karakia.
9 Meeting Close
The meeting closed at 3:46 pm.
The minutes of this meeting were confirmed at the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Meeting held on 24 March 2021.
...................................................
CHAIRPERSON
24 March 2021 |
5.1 Recommendation to Remove ARF011 Organisational Cohesion Risk from the Organisational Risk Dashboard
File Number: A3110274
Author: Tanya Reid, Business Improvement Specialist
Authoriser: Jaime Dyhrberg, General Manager - Corporate Services (Acting)
Te Take Pūrongo / Purpose of the Report
To seek to approve the removal of ARF011 Organisational Cohesion risk from the organisational risk dashboard.
Te WhakarĀpopoto matua / Executive Summary
· ARF011 Organisational Cohesion risk is an organisational risk in the Operational/Financial category (whole of business view of the Council) performance including service/services delivery, risk, finance, environmental.
· Of the 12 risks adopted in May 2019 the ARF011 Organisational Cohesion was the second lowest priority risk with a medium impact score of 39.
· A comprehensive treatment plan has been implemented. Improvements from the treatments are now being experienced and the risk trend continues to decline in line with the desired residual risk score of 14.
· With a total residual impact score of 15, this risk is now assessed as low impact and unlikely to occur.
A recommendation to demote ARF011 Organisational Cohesion Risk from the organisational risk dashboard is supported by the total risk score and probability, and the controls in place.
ngĀ tŪtohunga / Recommendation That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee approves the removal of ARF011 Organisational Cohesion risk from the organisational risk dashboard. |
1) te TĀhuhu kŌrero / Background
In November 2018, elected members workshopped and agreed their top organisational risk dashboard. The top organisational risk dashboard was adopted 30th May 2019. Of the 12 risks originally on their risk dashboard the ARF011 Organisational Cohesion Risk was the second lowest priority risk with a medium impact score of 39.
Table 1: November 2018 ARF011 Organisational Cohesion Risk description and scoring
Description of risk and impact
Organisational Cohesion is the ability of the parts of the organisation to work together in a collaborative and productive manner to deliver on its strategies, plans and objectives.
Local Government organisations work on complex, costly, and often politically and socially sensitively multi-faceted issues requiring multiple parts of the organisation to work together effectively.
Breakdowns in cohesion can lead to costly delays and additional impacts such as communication overheads, lower morale, trust and churn.
In 2018, FNDC Council members and management acknowledged challenges in the working relationship between governance and management layers.
At that point while progress had been made to improve the challenges the following issues were being experienced:
• Delays in decisions due to papers being left to lie on the table
• Conduct and criticisms during Council meetings
• Sub-optimal cohesion between Council members
• Governance over-reach
• Information security
• Governance and other support resources not being utilized in their full capacity
• Requirement for controlled or restricted access to staff members
• Attendance levels at training and other events
• Not always following agreed or required processes
2) Te matapaki me NgĀ KŌwhiringa / Discussion and Options
Both elected members, including those newly elected to Council in October 2019, and staff acknowledged these challenges and have worked together to improve the relationship resulting in a more efficient and effective Council.
Improvements from the treatments are now being experienced and the risk trend continues to decline in line with the desired residual risk score of 14. Treatments in place include:
• Comprehensive induction and professional development programmes are in place to support elected members.
• A professional development plan has been developed for the Mayor and each elected member. These are informed by the results of an external competency assessment.
• A reporting framework is in place, to increase the quality of information to elected members and ensure relevant information to support decision-making processes is provided, and to verify organisational performance.
• Staff regularly schedule workshops to explain proposals and answer questions from elected members prior to formal meetings and decisions. Positive feedback has been received on this, especially by less experienced elected members.
• Regular communication between the organisation and elected members such as daily CEO briefing between the Mayor and Deputy Mayor; weekly Weekender newsletter published Friday to provide elected members information and up-dates on current projects which enables them to be abreast of Council current affairs; scripts from CEO staff videos are shared with elected members so they are aware of what is happening operationally; Councillors are actively involved in working groups e.g. Kerikeri Domain.
• Establishment of a virtual elected member lounge to facilitate elected member interaction. This has been used to provide draft feedback on the Long Term Plan
• Development of a dedicated physical space for elected member use in Kaikohe HQ and John Butler Centre.
• Staff conducted a survey, in 2020, to seek feedback from elected members as to their satisfaction on the quality of advice from staff. A total of two responses were received, indicating that this is no longer a “burning platform”.
• Progress is being made on establishing pre-agenda meetings between the Committee Chair and the executive sponsor of the Committee.
• Council pre-agenda meetings happen with SLT and Democracy Services who run through the agenda and the proposed resolutions. Progress is also being made on the Chief Executive briefing the Mayor on upcoming papers and proposed resolutions.
Our recent November 2020 CouncilMARK assessment (currently draft) observed that:
“Overall leadership of the Council is provided by a highly experienced Mayor who has over thirty years of public service. There is a good mix of youth and passion, as well as experience and wisdom amongst the elected members, and they seem to work well together and be united as a group.
The Mayor and Chief Executive have a strong relationship. They meet every week to discuss topical operational and strategic matters, and emerging issues. The Chief Executive’s and Council’s performance is also regularly discussed. They debate issues, sometimes vigorously, and, from time to time, they agree to disagree. However, the Mayor and Chief Executive stand united in public.
The Chief Executive is respected by the Mayor, elected members, and staff as a strong and capable leader who has embraced an inclusive style of leadership since arriving at Far North District Council. A comprehensive performance agreement and a structured professional development plan are in place for the Chief Executive. Key performance indicators are aligned with agreed Council priorities.”
CouncilMARK called out the following strengths in the Governance, leadership and strategy quadrant:
· Council leaders show strong intent to lift Council performance, to meet service level expectations and well-being outcomes.
· The Mayor and Chief Executive are experienced and respected leaders.
· A high level of commitment and engagement is apparent amongst the elected members, especially the first term members.
Te Take Tūtohunga / Reason for the recommendation
A recommendation to demote ARF011 Organisational Cohesion Risk from the organisational risk dashboard is supported by the total risk score and probability, and controls in place.
In January 2021, ARF011 Organisational Cohesion Risk was rescored using the FNDC risk matrix. The rescoring is captured in Table 2.
Assessment of risk, impact and likelihood
Table 2: Jan 2021 ARF011 Organisational Cohesion Risk impact score using FNDC matrix:
|
Financial |
Customer |
Reputational |
Compliance/Legal |
Health and Safety |
||||||||||
High - Intolerable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
Low- none |
x |
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlikely |
Probable |
Will Happen |
Unlikely |
Probable |
Will Happen |
Unlikely |
Probable |
Will Happen |
Unlikely |
Probable |
Will Happen |
Unlikely |
Probable |
Will Happen |
ARF011 Organisational Cohesion Risk is an organisational risk in the Operational/Financial category (whole of business view of FNDC performance including service/services delivery, risk, finance, environmental). Organisational risks may impact on council achieving its vision, mission and community outcomes. With a total residual impact score of 15 this risk is now assessed as low impact and unlikely to occur, see table 3.
Table 3: ARF011 Organisational Cohesion Risk map as assessed January 2021
|
Total Risk |
||
High - Intolerable |
|
|
|
Medium |
|
|
|
Low- none |
x |
|
|
|
Unlikely |
Probable |
Will Happen |
This reduction in risk score has been achieved through proactive changes and controls. Current ARF011 Organisational Cohesion Risk controls in place are:
1. CEO Group Risk Register: continue risk management via the CEO Office Risk Register, see table 4: Definition of risk from CEO Office Risk Register.
2. Elected member induction and professional development programme.
3. Individual elected member professional development plans.
4. Reporting framework.
5. Elected member workshops for staff to explain proposals and answer questions.
6. Regular communication between the organisation and elected members.
7. Virtual elected member lounge.
8. Dedicated space for elected member use in Kaikohe HQ and JBC.
9. Pre-agenda meetings between the Committee Chair and the Committee executive sponsor.
10. SLT Council pre-agenda meetings.
Table 4: Definition of risk from CEO Office Risk Register:
Group / SLT |
Risk level |
Inherent Risk |
Risk description |
Because of |
There is a chance that… |
leading to… |
|
CEO Office |
Organisational |
15 |
Operational/Financial |
Complex, costly and often politically and socially sensitive multi-faceted issues. |
If we do not have organisational cohesion (ability to work together in a collaborative and productive way) because of suboptimal relationships between staff and Elected members. |
Council may be unable to deliver to Elective Member strategic priorities, plans and objectives. |
3) NgĀ PĀnga PŪtea me ngĀ wĀhanga tahua / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision
There is no financial implication or request for budgetary provision.
Nil
Te Hōtaka Take Ōkawa / Compliance schedule:
Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:
1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,
a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and
b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and
c) If any of the options identified under paragraph (a) involves a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water, take into account the relationship of Māori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral land, water sites, waahi tapu, valued flora and fauna and other taonga.
2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.
He Take Ōkawa / Compliance requirement |
Te Aromatawai Kaimahi / Staff assessment |
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy |
The recommendation in this report does not meet the thresholds as per the Council’s significance and engagement policy. |
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision. |
Risk Management Policy. |
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought. |
None. |
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. |
The recommendation in this report does not have any direct implications for Māori. |
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example – youth, the aged and those with disabilities). |
There are no affected or interested parties to this recommendation. |
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision. |
There is no financial implication or request for budgetary provision. |
Chief Financial Officer review. |
The Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report. |
24 March 2021 |
6.1 Council Financial Report for the Period Ending 28 February 2021
File Number: A3111486
Author: Angie Thomas, Manager - Accounting Services
Authoriser: Jaime Dyhrberg, General Manager - Corporate Services (Acting)
TE TAKE PŪRONGO / Purpose of the Report
To provide an overview and information on the current financial position and performance of the Far North District Council as at 28 February 2021.
TE WHAKARĀPOPOTO MATUA / Executive SummarY
This report provides a summary overview, Statement of Financial Performance, Capital Performance and Borrowing and Investment reports.
NGĀ TŪTOHUNGA / Recommendation That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee receive the report Council Financial Report for the Period Ending 28 February 2021. |
TE tĀHUHU KŌRERO / Background
This report provides financial information as at 28 February 2021.
TE MATAPAKI ME NGĀ KŌWHIRINGA / Discussion and Next Steps
The report is for information only.
NGĀ PĀNGA PŪTEA ME NGĀ WĀHANGA TAHUA / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision
There are no financial implications or budgetary provisions required as a result of this report.
1. Council
Financial Report Feb 2021 (Pd8) - A3112282 ⇩
Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Meeting Agenda |
24 March 2021 |
![]() |
Far North District Council
Council Financial Report
for the period ending 28-February-2021
Contents
Financial Overview................................................................................................................................................................ 3
Council Financial Performance – Income..................................................................................................................... 4
Council Financial Performance – Operational Expenditure.................................................................................... 5
Council Financial Performance – Capital Expenditure............................................................................................. 6
Unbudgeted Expenditure.................................................................................................................................................... 7
Budget Movements............................................................................................................................................................ 11
Treasury Report................................................................................................................................................................... 13
Treasury Compliance........................................................................................................................................................ 14
Statement of Financial Performance............................................................................................................................ 15
Statement of Capital Performance................................................................................................................................ 16
Analysis of Operational Income and Expenditure by LTP Group....................................................................... 17
Key financial metrics from the Statement of Financial Performance for the Far North District Council as at 28-February-2021.
The overall performance of Council has continued as usual even though we have only just come out of the final drought level, post COVID-19 and the recent flood event.
The organisation is refocusing their priorities in order to accommodate these situations so ongoing income and expenditure will be reviewed.
With every new financial year there are a number of variances across the organisation, this is mainly due to timing of the budgets. These are being reviewed and will be timed accordingly in the coming months.
The commentary this month will only be by exception.
Overall, we had a Variance to Budget YTD movement of $14.2M.
*In the tables above and throughout this report, variances +/- 5% from budget are indicated as on track / green, anything outside this is red.
Council Financial Performance – Income
Please note these figures relate to the Statement of Financial Performance controllable costs only, which excludes general rates and rates penalties.
Highlights:
Other Income
· Planned Provincial Growth Funds (PGF) have been received for the Lake Omapere de-mobilisation.
· Planned Provincial Growth Funds (PGF) have been received to support for road seal projects at Ruapekapeka, Ngapipito and Peria Road.
· Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) grant received under the maintaining the quality of great rides fund for the Twin Cost Cycletrail.
· Unbudgeted grant has been received for the July 2020 Flood program for the vegetation clearance and clean-up from the Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE).
· The dividend payment from Far North Holdings (FNHL) has been partly paid in March 2021.
Central Govt Subsidies – New Works
· Ongoing unbudgeted Tourism Infrastructure Funds (TIF) received from Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) for the construction of public toilets at Opononi, Mitimiti, Waitangi boat ramp and Haruru Falls bush walk.
· Subsidy new works income for ongoing minor safety & improvements projects from last financial year for bridges at Otaua Rd, West Coast Rd; Panguru Rd raising and associated improvements.
· Unbudgeted Tourism Infrastructure Funds (TIF) grant received for the Waitangi Jetty Toilet capacity upgrade and Cable Bay Carparks and Hundertwasser carpark lighting projects.
· Subsidy received from the Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) for the Pungaere Road seal extension.
· Unbudgeted subsidy received from Waka Kotahi (NZTA) for the Te Hiku Community Board footpath project North Park Drive to Whangatane Drive,Kaitaia and Bay of Islands – Whangaroa Community Board footpath project for Pa Road.
· Unbudgeted subsidy received from Waka Kotahi (NZTA) for the shared path walking and cycling project along State Highway 1, Kawakawa.
Central Govt Subsidies – Renewals
· Sealed road resurfacing and rehabilitation are behind schedule as contractor resources were reprioritised to undertake repairs for the July 2020 storm event.
· The North sealing is 56% complete and South sealing is at 76% complete and still behind their planned programme due to short supply of sealing aggregate. Both contractors will be increasing resources in the coming months to complete in mid-Autumn.
· Rehabilitation works on 5 out of the 7 sites are complete for both the North and South contracts and have been progressing steadily, however due to the inability to complete prior year works this has delayed the programme but NTA and the contractors are confident to delivery by mid-Autumn.
· Safety improvement bridge and resilience projects across district has not commenced as planned, however, procurement and awarded contracts are being finalised.
· Offset by, emergency works tenders has come under budget due to competitive pricing and additional funds received for the recent July 2020 storm events.
· Unsealed Road Metalling is ahead of schedule due to the suitable weather conditions before the summer season.
Other Contributions
· Planned Provincial Growth Funds (PGF) capital grant received for road seal projects at Ruapekapeka. Ngapipito and Peria Road.
· Provincial Growth Funds (PGF) received for projects Kerikeri Domain, Waipapa Sports Hub and Te Hiku o te Ika Kaitaia Revitalisation.
· Provincial Growth Funds (PGF) received for the Southern Animal Welfare Facility.
· Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) funding has been received for the 3 Water Reform project.
· Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) grant funds received for the Te Tai Tokerau Worker Redeployment scheme.
Please note these figures relate to the Statement of Financial Performance controllable costs only, which excludes allocations, interest costs, depreciation and other asset costs and gain/loss on disposal.
Highlights:
Contractor Fees
· Sealed Pavement maintenance works in the southern area is behind budget due to contractor lack of resources. NTA has put the contractor on notice and are confident this will be sorted in due course and confident the program will be delivered by the end of the financial year.
· This has been offset by an overspend in contract professional fees relating to Programme Darwin. A contractor has been engaged to fill a position that would normally be undertaken by a staff member.
· There is a variance related to both a timing issue with budget phasing and increased Ventia Limited expenditure over the first 6 months of the year in the areas of labour, materials and sub-contractors relating to the July 2020 storm event for response and recovery. In the second half of the year labour costs are flattening out and direct plant costs are increasing against budget. Other key variances relate to power cable replacements, the Paihia STP upgrade, Sweetwater Bore & Bonnets Road equipment hire and verification of flow meters.
Professional Fees
· A number of consultants have not yet been engaged across the organisation.
General Expenses
· General expenses are behind budget across the whole of the organisation.
Highlights:
New Works
· The East Coast WWTP Resource Consent is under budget - the consent has been appealed to the environment court and Council is working towards mediation which has been significantly delayed due to COVID-19 and conflicting schedules between stakeholders.
· The Paihia Treatment Plant Improvements project is under budget, it is currently in design phase for a recirculation system which will enhance and prolong the lifespan of the new plant, commitments have been raised.
· District wide sludge management is under budget. Sludge work has been delayed due to lack of resourcing and COVID-19. Work is ongoing and commitments have been raised.
· The Houhora Wastewater Treatment Plant, the Council approved project is under budget to replace sand and treatment tank. The sand has now been replaced but there has been a delay with the tank.
· Planned Provincial Growth Funds (PGF) road sealing projects commenced at Ruapekapeka. Ngapipito and Peria Road.
· Panguru Rd raising project stage 1 has now been completed and a proposed stage 2 is yet to be done, offset by the Infill Lighting project which is behind programme due to lengthy negotiations and approval of the tender phase, however the contract is now essentially approved and ready to start construction.
· Pungaere Road project has experienced some delays in the investigation and design as a result of negotiations with a resident over drainage issues, a managed cattle underpass is to be installed before road construction commences.
· Kaitaia New Source (Sweetwater) is behind budget for a number of reasons but funds are fully committed. Due to the delay in the contract being awarded this will result in an underspend this financial year however, the DIA grant funds of $1.7M have been received.
· Unbudgeted purchase of the Kaitaia Warehouse property in support of the Te Hiku revitalisation project.
· Kerikeri Wastewater Treatment Plant has gone over budget, a final subsidy will be applied for to partially offset this.
· Ongoing unbudgeted Tourism Infrastructure Funds (TIF) received from Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (MBIE) for the construction of public toilets at Opononi, Mitimiti, Waitangi boat ramp and Haruru Falls bush walk.
o Mitimiti has been completed.
o Other projects were delayed. Construction commenced in November 2020 at the Opononi I-Site public toilets.
o Consent for the Waitangi boat ramp public toilets has been approved and the tender process has commenced.
o Tender has been awarded for the Haruru Falls public toilets after changing the scope and design to include more natural light as the cost of getting the power to the site was too excessive.
· The Centennial/Jaycee Park project works for construction of the basketball court and footpath completed in February 2021. Planting works are expected to commence in April after finalising the award of the contract.
· Te Hiku Sports Netball Court project will go back out for tender due to lack of interest, however, if awarded the construction is likely to commence in the next financial year.
Renewals
· Kerikeri Wastewater Treatment Plant is under budget. The commissioning phase of the plant will run until the end of November at which time connections will commence and be completed by May 2021 with close out expected in June 2021.
· Emergency Works awarded tenders have come under budget due to competitive pricing.
· Sealed road resurfacing and rehabilitation are behind schedule as contractor resources were reprioritised to undertake repairs for the July 2020 storm event. The North sealing is 56% complete and South sealing is at 76% complete and still behind their planned programme due to short supply of sealing aggregate. Both contractors will be increasing resources in the coming months to complete the programme by mid-Autumn.
· Rehabilitation works on 5 out of the 7 sites are complete for both the North and South contracts and have been progressing steadily, however due to the inability to complete prior year works this has delayed the programme but NTA and the contractors are confident to delivery by mid-Autumn.
· Ferry renewal scope and works are reduced due to long lead time to get the jet pump into the country.
· Safety improvement, bridge and resilience projects across district has not commenced as planned, however. procurement and awarded contracts are being finalised.
· Unsealed Road Metalling is ahead of schedule due to the suitable weather conditions.
These are additional works not included in the original budget for the current year.
Unbudgeted work greater than $100,000 must be approved by Council, anything less than that can be approved by a General Manager with appropriate financial delegation.
Unbudgeted Expenditure |
|
|
*Expenditure over $100K approved by Council (in grey) |
|
|
|
|
|
Unbudgeted Operational |
|
Amount |
Facilities operations - not buildings |
Professional Fees |
150,000 |
Maritime Facilities |
External Services |
30,000 |
Public Toilets |
Repairs & Maintenance Buildings |
6,400 |
|
|
186,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbudgeted Capital Works |
|
Amount |
Te Hiku o te Ika - PGF |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
7,000,000 |
Kerikeri Domain - PGF |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
3,000,000 |
Waipapa Sports Hub - PGF |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
2,000,000 |
Hokianga Harbour Coastal Repairs |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
1,815,000 |
Kaitaia New Source (Sweetwater) - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
1,754,000 |
Monument Hill Drought Impact - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
1,184,000 |
Dog Pound Southern |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
1,000,000 |
Lake Omapere (PGF) |
External Services |
500,000 |
Kerikeri WTP New Clarifiers - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
500,000 |
Water main renewals - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
330,000 |
Windsor Landing Carpark and Access Road |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
291,195 |
Network model updates - Stormwater - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
250,000 |
Network model updates - Wastewater - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
250,000 |
Network model updates - Water - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
250,000 |
Enhanced water leak repairs - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
200,000 |
Ex res chlorine measurements - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
200,000 |
Awanui River Intake Permanent Weir - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
150,000 |
Kotui Library Licence/Subscription System |
Software Licence Fees |
137,863 |
WWTP Wetland remedial works - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
130,000 |
Water Safety Plan updates - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
130,000 |
Houhora WWTP |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
112,000 |
Rangitane Maritime Boat Ramp |
CAPEX Renewal Works Contract Services |
111,925 |
Structural works Kawakawa WTP |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
109,051 |
Paihia WTP Self-Cleaning Screen - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
100,000 |
District Wide Leak Detection Equipment - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
100,000 |
Okaihau Bore Refurbishment - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
100,000 |
Hundertwasser toilet upgrade |
CAPEX Renewal Works Contract Services |
82,000 |
Kawakawa Water Take Consent - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
70,000 |
Water Safety Lead - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - OPEX Salaries |
50,000 |
East Coast PS Bush Point Rd |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
49,942 |
Kawakawa WTP Roof Replacement |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
47,366 |
Kaikohe Streetscape Project |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
40,000 |
East Coast PS Leslie Rd |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
38,000 |
Kerikeri Wastewater Infrastructre |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
31,836 |
Regional Allocation - Wastewater - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
24,000 |
Regional Allocation - Stormwater - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
23,000 |
Regional Allocation - Water - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
23,000 |
60 Peninsula Parade Hihi Sewer Connection |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
22,387 |
Network Model review lead - Stormwater- 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
17,000 |
Network Model review lead - Wastewater - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
16,500 |
Network Model review lead - Water - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
16,500 |
Opononi/Omapere WTP pH Treatment |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
15,000 |
Kerikeri Wastewater Infrastructre |
Equipment Purchases (uncapitalisable) |
13,827 |
Mitimiti Toilet (TIF) |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
13,000 |
Proof of concept - new ways of working |
External Services |
12,788 |
Te Hononga CCTV - Hundertwasser |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
12,000 |
Rawene Housing for the Elderly |
CAPEX Renewal Works Contract Services |
11,836 |
Operational Data Management Software - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
10,000 |
Operational Data Management Software - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
10,000 |
Operational Data Management Software - 3 Waters Reform |
3 Waters Reform - Professional Fees |
10,000 |
Rawene Hall |
CAPEX Renewal Works Contract Services |
4,110 |
Operational Data Management Software - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-10,000 |
Operational Data Management Software - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-10,000 |
Operational Data Management Software - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-10,000 |
Network Model review lead - Wastewater - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-16,500 |
Network Model review lead - Water - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-16,500 |
Network Model review lead - Stormwater- 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-17,000 |
Regional Allocation - Stormwater - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-23,000 |
Regional Allocation - Water - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-23,000 |
Regional Allocation - Wastewater - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-24,000 |
Water Safety Lead - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-50,000 |
Kawakawa Water Take Consent - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Capital |
-70,000 |
Paihia WTP Self-Cleaning Screen - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Capital |
-100,000 |
District Wide Leak Detection Equipment - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Capital |
-100,000 |
Okaihau Bore Refurbishment - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Capital |
-100,000 |
WWTP Wetland remedial works - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-130,000 |
Water Safety Plan updates - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-130,000 |
Awanui River Intake Permanent Weir - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Capital |
-150,000 |
Enhanced water leak repairs - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-200,000 |
Ex res chlorine measurements - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Capital |
-200,000 |
Network model updates - Stormwater - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-250,000 |
Network model updates - Wastewater - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-250,000 |
Network model updates - Water - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Operational |
-250,000 |
Water main renewals - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Capital |
-330,000 |
Lake Omapere (PGF) |
Grants Operational |
-500,000 |
Kerikeri WTP New Clarifiers - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Capital |
-500,000 |
Dog Pound Southern |
Grants Capital |
-1,000,000 |
Monument Hill Drought Impact - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Capital |
-1,184,000 |
Kaitaia New Source (Sweetwater) - 3 Waters Reform |
Grants Capital |
-1,754,000 |
Hokianga Harbour Coastal Repairs |
Subsidy New Works |
-1,815,000 |
Waipapa Sports Hub - PGF |
Grants Capital |
-2,000,000 |
Kerikeri Domain - PGF |
Grants Capital |
-3,000,000 |
Te Hiku o te Ika - PGF |
Grants Capital |
-7,000,000 |
|
|
1,156,126 |
|
|
|
Unbudgeted Roading |
|
Amount |
Ngapipito Road - PGF |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
6,850,000 |
Peria Road - PGF |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
6,446,000 |
Ruapekapeka Road - PGF |
CAPEX New Works Contract Services |
6,133,000 |
District Wide Storm Response & Mitigation - MBIE |
CAPEX Renewal Works Contract Services |
699,529 |
Kawakawa Safety and Streetscape Improvement Project |
External Services |
474,375 |
Peria Road - PGF |
CAPEX New Works Professional Fees |
400,000 |
District Wide Storm Response & Mitigation - MBIE |
External Services |
250,000 |
Peria Road - PGF |
External Services |
204,000 |
Ruapekapeka Road - PGF |
CAPEX New Works Professional Fees |
200,000 |
Ngapipito Road - PGF |
CAPEX New Works Professional Fees |
140,000 |
Moerewa Safe Streets - Innovating Streets |
External Services |
126,500 |
Ruapekapeka Road - PGF |
External Services |
117,000 |
Tai Tokerau Kaikohe Safe Streets - Innovating Streets |
External Services |
111,550 |
Ngapipito Road - PGF |
External Services |
60,000 |
Ruapekapeka Road - PGF |
Professional Fees PSU New Works |
50,000 |
Ngapipito Road - PGF |
Professional Fees PSU New Works |
50,000 |
Peria Road - PGF |
Professional Fees PSU New Works |
50,000 |
Moerewa Drainage Works - MBIE |
CAPEX Renewal Works Contract Services |
29,187 |
Moerewa Drainage Works - MBIE |
External Services |
20,914 |
Moerewa Drainage Works - MBIE |
Grants Operational |
-20,914 |
Moerewa Drainage Works - MBIE |
Grants Capital |
-29,187 |
Ngapipito Road - PGF |
Grants Operational |
-60,000 |
Ruapekapeka Road - PGF |
Grants Operational |
-117,000 |
Peria Road - PGF |
Grants Operational |
-204,000 |
District Wide Storm Response & Mitigation - MBIE |
Grants Operational |
-250,000 |
District Wide Storm Response & Mitigation - MBIE |
Grants Capital |
-699,529 |
Ruapekapeka Road - PGF |
Grants Capital |
-6,383,000 |
Peria Road - PGF |
Grants Capital |
-6,896,000 |
Ngapipito Road - PGF |
Grants Capital |
-7,040,000 |
|
|
712,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,054,951 |
These are budgets timed in future years, brought forward into the current year (positive values) OR budgets timed in the current year to be moved out to future years (negative values).
The figures that follow exclude the $5M Roading budget adjustment moved out to future years to reflect the lower of FNDC or NZTA budget.
Budget Movements |
|
|
|
|
|
General Ledger |
Comment |
Amount |
Infrastructure & Asset Management Operations |
TIF funding applications wrongly classified as Capex in EB |
1,100,000 |
Pou Herenga Tai Cycle Trail NZ Heritage |
Cycletrail MBIE grant July 2020 storm event |
241,000 |
Community Board Operations |
Opex budget savings 2020-2021 Corporate Services |
-349 |
Internal Control & Risk Management |
Opex budget savings 2020-2021 Corporate Services |
-2,000 |
Community Board Operations |
Opex budget savings 2020-2021 Corporate Services |
-5,000 |
Community Board Operations |
Opex budget savings 2020-2021 Corporate Services |
-5,000 |
Council Advisory Services |
Opex budget savings 2020-2021 Corporate Services |
-5,220 |
Internal Control & Risk Management |
Opex budget savings 2020-2021 Corporate Services |
-12,000 |
Pou Herenga Tai Cycle Trail NZ Heritage |
Cycletrail MBIE grant July 2020 storm event |
-241,000 |
|
|
1,070,431 |
|
|
|
Project Ledger |
Comment |
Amount |
Kaikohe Footpath Signal Station Rd, Omapere - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
300,700 |
Footpaths Northern Ward |
Reforecast NZTA Subsidy to gross up for CB New Footpath projects |
205,573 |
Hokianga Harbour Coastal Repairs |
Hokianga Harbour Coastal Repairs Correction of budget & forecast |
200,000 |
Tree Management Eastern Ward |
Te Tai Tokerau Worker Redeployment Packa age for Vegetation Clearance & Clean Ups |
150,000 |
Length of Blacks Road - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
110,000 |
Footpaths Eastern Ward |
Reforecast NZTA Subsidy to gross up for CB New Footpath projects |
105,073 |
Footpaths Western Ward |
Reforecast NZTA Subsidy to gross up for CB New Footpath projects |
105,073 |
RFID Installation |
RFID Budget Brought Forward |
90,000 |
Donald Ln to WINZ on N Park Drive - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
80,000 |
IT Online Services Stage 3 |
Pathway Online Services funds from future year 2021-22 required |
70,330 |
Foreshore Road, Taipa Footpath - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
70,000 |
Ward Wide Town Beautification / Improvements Western |
Ward Wide Town Western Beautification / Improvements |
52,275 |
Point Road, Taipa - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
40,000 |
Disability Access Halls Western |
Budget Movement Disability Access Hall Western - LOS |
28,320 |
Tree Management Northern Ward |
Te Tai Tokerau Worker Redeployment Packa age for Vegetation Clearance & Clean Ups |
25,000 |
Tree Management WesternWard |
Te Tai Tokerau Worker Redeployment Packa age for Vegetation Clearance & Clean Ups |
25,000 |
Mamaru Road Footpath - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
20,000 |
Rawene Housing for the Elderly |
Rawene HFTE Unit3 building structural & plumbing fixtures renewal |
15,753 |
Rawene Hall |
Budget Movement Rawene Hall Deck Rpairs - Renewal |
8,250 |
Panguru Transfer Station |
Panguru Transfer Station Sealing - Renewals budget |
4,698 |
Russell Chapel Street Carpark |
Russell Chapel Street Carpark Remove budget now project |
-2,245 |
Parks & Reserves Western |
P&R Western Assets moving out ot future years |
-3,251 |
Water Saving Devices for Russell public toilet facilities |
Budget not required this FY Move to 2024-25 |
-5,000 |
Mamaru Road Footpath - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
-20,000 |
Tree Management Northern Ward |
Te Tai Tokerau Worker Redeployment Packa age for Vegetation Clearance & Clean Ups |
-25,000 |
Tree Management Western Ward |
Te Tai Tokerau Worker Redeployment Packa age for Vegetation Clearance & Clean Ups |
-25,000 |
Parks & Reserves Western |
P&R Western Assets moving out to future years |
-32,511 |
Point Road, Taipa - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
-40,000 |
Water Saving Devices for Russell public toilet facilities |
Budget not required this FY Move to 2024-25 |
-50,000 |
Foreshore Road, Taipa Footpath - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
-70,000 |
Donald Ln to WINZ on N Park Drive - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
-80,000 |
Length of Blacks Road - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
-110,000 |
Russell Chapel Street Carpark |
Russell Chapel Street Carpark Remove budget now project |
-122,451 |
Tree Management Eastern Ward |
Te Tai Tokerau Worker Redeployment Packa age for Vegetation Clearance & Clean Ups |
-150,000 |
Footpaths Eastern Ward |
Reforecast NZTA Subsidy to gross up for CB New Footpath projects |
-175,473 |
Footpaths Western Ward |
Reforecast NZTA Subsidy to gross up for CB New Footpath projects |
-175,473 |
Maritime - Improvement to Structures |
Hokianga Harbour Coastal Repairs Correction of budget & forecast |
-200,000 |
Kaikohe Footpath Signal Stn Rd, Omapere - MBIE |
New footpath redeployment package MBIE shovel ready funds 2020-21 |
-300,700 |
Footpaths Northern Ward |
Reforecast NZTA Subsidy to gross up for CB New Footpath projects |
-343,308 |
TIF Funding Application |
TIF funding applications wrongly classified as Capex in EB |
-1,100,000 |
|
|
-1,324,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
-253,933 |
Statement of Financial Performance
Statement of Capital Performance
Analysis of Operational Income and Expenditure by LTP Group
24 March 2021 |
6.2 Risk Progress Report for Programme of Externally Funded Projects
File Number: A3110299
Author: Tanya Reid, Business Improvement Specialist
Authoriser: Jaime Dyhrberg, General Manager - Corporate Services (Acting)
TE TAKE PŪRONGO / Purpose of the Report
To provide a risk progress report on the risks associated with the programme of the externally funded “shovel ready” projects that form part of the Governments economic response to the COVID-19 pandemic. No decision is required.
TE WHAKARĀPOPOTO MATUA / Executive SummarY
As a part of the current government’s economic response to the COVID-19 pandemic Council, and the Far North District, have secured external project funds. The goal of this funding is to provide economic stimulus and employment opportunity within the Far North District.
This risk progress report provides an up-date to inform the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee, in their governance role, how we are managing the uncertainty.
NGĀ TŪTOHUNGA / Recommendation That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee receive the report Risk Progress Report for Programme of Externally Funded Projects.
|
TE tĀHUHU KŌRERO / Background
The current COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted our nation and district. As part of their response to the negative economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, central government have provided a number of infrastructure funds to help stimulate the economy. Council bid, and has won, funding for a programme of “shovel ready” projects (These projects are also known as “ESEO” (economic stimulus, employment opportunity) projects and for clarity will be referred to, within this report, as externally funded). These eleven projects are:
1. Te Hiku Revitalisation
2. Waipapa Sports Hub
3. Kerikeri Domain
4. Kawakawa Innovating Streets
5. Kaikohe Innovating Streets
6. Moerewa Innovating Streets
7. Monument Hill Deep Bore
8. Kerikeri Reticulation
9. Otiria Rugby Club
10. Priority roading (three roads) to provide supplementary tarmacked routes for logging and agricultural trucks
11. Ruapekapeka Road upgrade
The characteristics of these externally funded projects are:
· that they are either wholly, or partially, externally funded
· may involve multiple funding streams
· with different funding requirements and conditions
· have multiple stakeholders, who may also be the project lead
· have short milestone timelines associated with the delivery of the projects the funding is intended for.
Four externally funded project risks were identified and presented to the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee in October 2020. These risks are (see table 1 for a full description):
1. Complexity external funding
2. Funding gap
3. Impact on rates
4. Disruptions
These four risks are classified as organisational risks in the Operational/Financial category (whole of business view of FNDC performance including service/services delivery, risk, finance, environmental). Organisational risks may impact on council achieving its vision, mission and community outcomes. Each of the risks has been assessed as medium impact and likely to occur. The risks are recorded in the IAMs Risk Register where Treatment owners and progress is also recorded.
TE MATAPAKI ME NGĀ KŌWHIRINGA / Discussion and Next Steps
A range of mitigations, treatments, have been developed and implemented. A summary of these is provided below in table 1.
To support and monitor this programme of work we have implemented a structured reporting programme. The reporting programme is structured in three parts:
1. A Programme Steering Group with terms of reference is in place. The Programme Steering Group meets four weekly to receive a brief report on each of the externally funded projects and to decide key legal and funding arrangements such as ownership of assets created.
2. Regular monthly reporting to SLT Performance Meeting.
3. Regular monthly reporting into IAMs Business Report
The Government goal of providing this funding is to provide economic stimulus and employment opportunity within the Far North District. These goals can be categorised as:
1. Jobs and careers
2. Arresting and reversing environmental degradation
3. Partnering with Tangata Whenua
4. Growing the local market
5. Ratepayer affordability
The following provides a brief up-date, and understanding, on the progress to-date towards achieving the Governments overarching goals.
1. Jobs and careers
To address the challenges of intergenerational poverty and disparity through high unemployment of Māori and youth within Northland. To provide training and career pathways that move people from low-paid to highly paid skilled workers. To break the cycle of the working poor, eventually raising the minimum wage to the Living Wage.
· Positive weighting for Maori Business in tender evaluations have been incorporated into procurement documents.
· Te Puni Kōkiri (TPK) attended contractor workshops in Kaitaia and Kerikeri to meet and co-ordinate support for Maori business. Capturing Maori employment data is a target for ongoing improvement.
· Amotai – Supplier diversity specialist will provide registration and additional support services for Maori and Pasifika businesses. Amotai will also provide lists of Maori businesses across a range of categories to enable target invitations to tenders. (Kerikeri Domain and Waipapa Sports Hub design is an example)
· Northtec attended contractor workshops to offer training options and to support businesses looking for additional staff. Northtec have since worked with a number of FNDC local contractors around training and upskilling.
· Health and Safety training, Working at Heights, chainsaw and abrasive wheels courses have been undertaking. The working at heights courses were found necessary so that sculpturers can work safely during the carving of sculptures over two meters. The training courses are funded from PGF and will help to develop skills amongst local operatives.
· Joint Venture options are under consideration in a number of areas to enable more mature contractors to engage local contractors on components of specialised projects and to qualify local business for ongoing maintenance (e.g. shade sails, picnic table concrete bases, pump track, specialist design).
Te Hiku Revitalisation |Waipapa Sports Hub | Kerikeri Domain |Kawakawa Innovating Streets |Kaikohe Innovating Streets | Moerewa Innovating Streets |Monument Hill Deep Bore | Kerikeri Reticulation |Otiria Rugby Club |
|
People Employed on Projects |
83 |
Maori and Pasifika |
39 |
Job Creation/Protection |
12 |
Ruapekapeka Road, Peria Road and Ngapipito Road figures are not yet included. Contracts awarded to date for the major contractors have 30% local employment criteria.
2. Arresting and reversing environmental degradation
Climate change and water security and resilience are number one risks to our community from an infrastructure, wellbeing and economic perspective. We must protect and secure our water sources and protect our natural environment for generations to come. Our natural environment including our water and soil is our future economic potential.
· Green design experience is a specific skillset targeted in designer selection.
· Water harvesting for the local community is incorporated into plans at Otiria Rugby club.
· Water bore for self-sufficient supply is a project objective at Waipapa Sports Hub and is currently under action.
· Significant native plantings are incorporated into design requirements.
3. Partnering with Tangata Whenua
With 50.5% of our District’s population of Māori descent, and 11 iwi and 200+ hapu, we must work harder to create meaningful relationships and genuine participation in delivering services and resolving challenges in the Far North.
· Te Hiku project working group includes local Kaumatua who liaise with local Iwi for creation of cultural art installations. A significant amount of time has been spent on consultation with the appropriate Iwi groups for input into the streetscaping and cultural art works. Final costings and contract agreements are in negotiation phase now which will allow the artist to make a start in the very near future.
· Ruapekapeka Road has an agreement in place with Te Ruapekapeka Trust (includes representation from local Hapu/Iwi and DOC). This includes provisions for cultural monitors and local labour resources associated with local Marae.
· Direct support for the NAX Opua Cycle trail has involved significant consultation and liaison with Ngati Hine and a project management team with Hapu links has been engaged.
4. Growing the local market
Create opportunity for Far North businesses to participate in the delivery of services to FNDC. We recognise the importance of a healthy, resilient local supply chain in providing diversity of competent suppliers, growing economic potential for Far North business to participate in national and export contract, and building deeper economic resilience within our community.
· Health and Safety prequalification and operating systems have been identified as a major barrier to growth for a significant number of local businesses. SiteWise accreditation is the required Health and Safety standard for FNDC, WDC and KDC. 40 businesses attended SiteWise workshops in Kerikeri and Kaitaia. 25 Local contractors are registered for additional assistance and are working with our Health and Safety team to gain SiteWise accreditation.
· Working at Heights training completed for local artists in Kaitaia to enable them to safely undertake scaffolding based work. Courses in Kerikeri and Kaitaia for other suppliers are in the planning stage.
· As newly qualified suppliers come onboard their details are shared with Facilities Maintenance Team to enter the available contractor pool.
· Move to electronic procurement platform to enable local businesses to easily compete for the large volume of minor works. This will also enable upskilling of business ability to submit good proposals.
· There will be a requirement to develop local businesses understanding of FNDC’s sustainable outcomes approach to procurement, including support with administrative processes to streamline their RFP response overheads.
· The award of the NAX Opua Project Management contract has directly contributed to a major project management company setting up an office in Northland.
5. Ratepayer affordability
As 27% of our ratepayers have household incomes of less than $30k pa, and only 21% with household incomes over $70k, our responsibility is to prioritise spend and investment where it is most needed. That we make assessments on a whole of life perspective while at the same time balancing the broader social, economic, environmental and cultural needs of our ratepayers.
· We are actively negotiating the requirement for out of region suppliers to qualify local business for the local installation works and ongoing maintenance. This will reduce ongoing operational costs.
· Taking a long-term view for cost reduction, such as working with a local supplier to stock supplies of certified playground bark. This not only works for the building phase of these projects but will reduce transport costs for the maintenance of existing playgrounds.
Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Meeting Agenda |
24 March 2021 |
Table 1: Externally funded project risks statements, treatments and progress are:
|
Score |
Because of …. |
There is a chance that…. |
Leading to…. |
Treatments: |
1 Complexity external funding |
29 |
The high level of complexity of the ESEO externally funded FNDC led projects: · short timelines to complete CAPEX projects · multiple funding pots · multiple external parties/stakeholders involved · different funding requirements · different external parties can be leading the projects e.g. FNHL
|
Projects may not proceed, may be delayed or not completed. |
Loss of funding; Reputational risk; Uncompleted projects; Legal / compliance disputes; Extended timelines; and/or Requirement for additional FNDC funding. |
In place: Central register capturing key governance and management information. In place: Establish Programme Steering Group. In place: Utilise project management methodology with risk analysis. Completed: Appoint professionally qualified project managers; In place: Using standard Council procurement strategy. Completed: Hold contractor engagement/information workshop re externally funded projects; In place: Set up a separate team to deliver the externally funded projects. In place: consultation plan and process for all projects. In place: Council approved amendments to FNDC process. |
2 Funding gap |
29 |
Projects are not fully funded, or funding agreements are not honoured or able to be honoured by the legal entities who sign the funding agreements with Government. |
Council may need to find additional funding to complete projects or projects may be abandoned. |
Council’s reputational damage; Increased borrowing to fund; Funding re-allocated from planned work; so annual plan objectives are not met; Increase risk to Council of asset failures; and/or Council has white elephants on the books. |
Completed: Review project funding commitments mid-September before. Completed: As the funding applicant understand Council’s obligations to funding providers; In place: Elected Member engagement strategy; monthly reporting into MBIE and discussions both local and in Wellington. In place: Funding agreements are in place for all projects we are in control of. |
3 Impact on rates |
25 |
Impact to long term rate payer funding requirements due to operational budget requirements / depreciation and upgrading of new assets.
|
There may be a need to increase rates to fund OPEX, depreciation and CAPEX requirements.
|
Additional costs to rate payers (as increased rates) impacting affordability across the district and negatively impacting current growth forecasts. |
Completed: Model financial implications to understand future operational requirements/costs, which includes costs to fund any community entity via a grant to manage an asset, including depreciation and renewal costs and their impact on rates; To be completed: Model the economic benefits to the ratepayers, their ability to earn greater income in the future from these projects (affordability metric); Ongoing: While there has not been an internal appointment of dedicated financial accountant a structure to report into Finance has been set up with a regular weekly meeting and report into finance team. |
4 Disruptions |
21 |
Disruption(s), out of our control (e.g. Drought / COVID-19), to agreed project timeline · disrupted supply chains; · shortages of required goods and services; and/or · need to halt the project as we are unable to work. |
We may not be able to deliver to, or renegotiate, the agreed milestones. |
Failure to deliver the project as project milestones that are linked to the funding payments are not achieved; or Additional cost to rate payers to complete the project. |
Ongoing: Monitor external environment and modify project plans as required.; Ongoing: Follow H&S protocols. |
Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Meeting Agenda |
24 March 2021 |
NGĀ PĀNGA PŪTEA ME NGĀ WĀHANGA TAHUA / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision
No additional budgetary provision is requested.
Nil
24 March 2021 |
File Number: A3111424
Author: Tanya Reid, Business Improvement Specialist
Authoriser: Jaime Dyhrberg, General Manager - Corporate Services (Acting)
TE TAKE PŪRONGO / Purpose of the Report
To provide a report on organisational risk management, emergent risk and scheduled risk progress reports for the organisation’s top risks.
No decision is required.
TE WHAKARĀPOPOTO MATUA / Executive SummarY
Risk progress updates are provided for four of the top organisational risks. The risk rating trend for three of these risks has been assessed as stable with a risk trend increase for one of the reported risks. No new emergent risks have been identified for inclusion in this report.
NGĀ TŪTOHUNGA / Recommendation That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee receive the report March Risk Management.
|
TE tĀHUHU KŌRERO / Background
The top organisational risks are risks that may impact on Council achieving its vision, mission and community outcomes and are regularly reported to the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee to ensure they are being appropriately managed. A number of these risks are subject to external influences which may affect effective council operations.
Table 1: provides a risk snapshot of the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Organisational Risk Dashboard with inherent and residual risk scores, as accepted by this Committee, and the risk progress to the residual risk score as assessed by the risk subject matter experts.
Table 2: details the 2021 Risk Work Programme.
Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Meeting Agenda |
24 March 2021 |
Table 1: Top Organisational Risk Dashboard |
Key to trend of risk rating: |
|
Decline |
|||||||
|
No change/stable |
|||||||||
|
Increase |
|||||||||
Risk ID: |
Risk title |
Inherent risk score |
Trend of risk rating |
Residual risk score |
Accountable |
Responsible |
Risk Progress Report |
Risk Progress Report ARF agenda: |
||
ARF001 |
Climate Change |
63 |
|
30 |
CEO |
GMSPP |
6 Monthly |
Mar 21 |
||
ARF003 |
Health & Safety Vulnerabilities |
46 |
|
34 |
CEO |
Manager P&C |
3 Monthly |
Feb 21 |
||
ARF004 |
Asset Management Risks |
45 |
|
18 |
CEO |
GMIAM |
6 Monthly |
Mar 21 |
||
ARF005 |
Affordability Risk |
45 |
|
26 |
CEO |
GMSPP |
6 Monthly |
Dec 20 |
||
ARF006 |
Project Priorities Deliveries Delays |
45 |
|
14 |
CEO |
GMIAM |
3 Monthly |
Feb 21 |
||
ARF007 |
Compliance NRC Abatements |
45 |
|
18 |
CEO |
GMIAM |
6 Monthly |
Dec 20 |
||
ARF009 |
Customer Service Delivery |
39 |
|
22 |
CEO |
Manager P&C |
3 Monthly |
Mar 21 |
||
ARF010 |
Data Governance Risks |
39 |
|
14 |
CEO |
CEO |
6 Monthly |
Dec 20 |
||
ARF011 |
Organisational Cohesion Risks |
29 |
|
14 |
CEO |
CEO |
6 Monthly |
Sept 20 |
||
ARF012 |
Contract Management Risks |
39 |
|
14 |
CEO |
GMIAM |
3 Monthly |
Feb 21 |
||
ARF013 |
Drinking Water Resilience |
35 |
|
ARF to agree level residual risk |
CEO |
GMIAM |
3 Monthly |
Mar 21 |
||
Table 2: 2021 Risk Programme
2021 ARF meeting date: |
10/02 |
24/03 |
05/05 |
16/06 |
21/07 |
08/09 |
20/10 |
01/12 |
Risk deep dives |
|
ARF011 |
ARF003 |
ARF013 |
ARF006 |
ARF004 |
ARF012 |
ARF005 |
|
||||||||
ARF001 Climate Change |
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
ARF003 Health & Safety Vulnerabilities |
ü |
|
ü |
|
ü |
ü |
|
ü |
ARF004 Asset Management Risks |
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
ARF005 Affordability |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
ARF006 Project - Priorities Deliveries Delays |
ü |
|
ü |
|
ü |
|
ü |
|
ARF007 Compliance NRC Abatements |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
ARF009 Customer Service Delivery |
|
ü |
|
ü |
|
ü |
|
ü |
ARF010 Data Governance Risks |
|
|
|
ü |
|
|
|
ü |
ARF012 Contract Management Risks |
ü |
|
ü |
|
ü |
|
ü |
|
ARF013 Drinking Water Resilience |
|
ü |
|
ü |
|
ü |
|
ü |
Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee Meeting Agenda |
24 March 2021 |
TE MATAPAKI ME NGĀ KŌWHIRINGA / Discussion and Next Steps
Organisational Risk Management
In December 2020, the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee attended a workshop to agree the residual risk score for ARF013, Drinking Water Resilience. Resilience is not only the ability to recover quickly from difficulties, it is also the ability to survive a crisis and thrive in a world of uncertainty. It is also more challenging to understand than risk. Due to the shortened workshop time, available in December, elected members were unable to assess their desired adaptive capacity to respond to events, articulated as residual risk score for staff to work towards. As a next step a staff workshop (16/01/2021) was held to understand our potential adaptive capacity based on current, and first three years Long Term Plan, drinking water resilience work. This, and further work, has identified three aspects to understanding our adaptive capacity – source, treatment and network, of which there are a number of contributing factors towards achieving resilience. Water Safety Plans are being updated for each of our eight water schemes. This significant piece of work will be completed within the next 12 months and will inform our understanding on the resilience issues faced by each scheme. When completed this assessment will then be used to inform the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee discussion to develop a residual risk profile.
The proposed 2021 risk work programme was agreed at the Feb 2021 Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee workshop. This is now included as table 2 (above).
A separate report on the March 2021 Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee agenda is a recommendation to remove ARF011 Organisational Cohesion Risk from the organisational risk dashboard, with ongoing risk oversight provided through inclusion on the CE Office Group Risk Register. The November 2020 CouncilMark Assessment provides external evidence in support of the recommendation to demote this risk from the organisational risk dashboard.
A separate risk progress report provides an update on how we are managing the risk associated with the external project funds Council has secured as part of the government’s economic response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The goal of this funding is to provide economic stimulus and employment opportunity within the Far North District.
Emergent risk:
No new emergent risks have been identified for inclusion in this report.
Table 3: Table of identified emergent risk
Emergent risks |
Presented to Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee |
Progress |
1. The risk of externally funded shovel ready, economic stimulus employment opportunity projects due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. |
October 2020 |
Subject of a report to the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee meeting of March 2021. |
2. The financial and legal risks due to the effects of climate change. Timing of a report on this risk, to the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee meeting, is to be determined. |
October 2020 |
An emergent risk report is proposed for the May 2021 agenda. |
3. District Services have proposed to escalate one of their top group risks for consideration of inclusion on the top organisational dashboard. |
October 2020 |
It is proposed that this be included in the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee risk workshop agenda. |
4. The risk of not fit for purpose business continuity arrangements.
|
October 2020 |
This was subject to a report at the December 20 Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee meeting. |
5. Extending the Government Procurement Rules to government entities in the New Zealand public sector. |
December 2020 |
An up-date was expected in the March 2021 risk management report. This is now expected in the May report. A full report to Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee is planned for May 2021. |
6. Development of new legislation and the creation of Taumata Arowai, the new Water Services Regulator, to oversee and enforce a new drinking water regulatory framework, with an additional oversight role for wastewater and stormwater networks. |
December 2020 |
Government report is due 08/06/21 |
7. Potential impact of the Worksafe decision, in December 2020, to charge 13 parties over the Whakaari/White Island tragedy; and the government review of Worksafe’s performance. |
February 2021 |
Impact to be considered when further information is to hand. |
Organisational risk progress reports:
Four scheduled risk progress reports, including high level treatment plan progress, are provided with highlights and analysis of risk progress below. More detail is available in the attached risk progress reports.
No additional reporting requirement for organisational risk has been identified.
Risk progress report – highlights and analysis:
1. ARF001 Climate Change Risk Progress Report: The risk rating trend has been assessed as increasing the “locking in” of the effects of climate change such as the melting of our polar ice.
2. ARF004 Asset Management Risks Risk Progress Report: The risk rating trend has been assessed as stable (no change). The plan is to continue to make progress against treatment solutions.
3. ARF009 Customer Service Delivery Risk Progress Report: The inherent risk rating trend has been assessed as stable (no change). It is noted that there may be a negative impact on this risk due to the changes proposed within the Long-term, FN2100, Rates Review and District Plans.
4. ARF013 Drinking Water Resilience Risk Progress Report: The risk rating trend has been assessed as stable (no change). The plan is to continue to progress treatments to build resilience.
Group Risk
Work is progressing with two groups to further enable good risk management and risk governance practice.
1. District Services - in addition to risk being a standard agenda item at their monthly management meeting - have successfully piloted a focussed quarterly District Services risk governance meeting with the GM District Services, and the tier three managers, to review their risk landscape. This promotes networking and discussion on new and emerging risks, progress on risk treatments; and supports the flow of information within the group.
2. Work has commenced with Infrastructure Asset Management (IAM), based on the District Services pilot, to design a risk management and governance programme to meet their requirements. Transformation and Assurance have partnered with key IAMs staff to present risk management programme firstly to the IAMs leadership forum and then to the full IAM staff meeting in March.
Business Continuity Arrangements
To continue to build organisational resilience, and adaptive capacity, we are working to refresh Council’s business continuity (and incident management) arrangements. There is a clear link between risk and requirements for increased resilience. This work will help us to focus on the key areas through a better understanding of what is most important to continue in times of disruption, identification of the resources required to keep these important functions and services functioning, and to develop strategies to achieve this where resilience needs enhancement. The process to refresh business continuity plans was piloted in the District Services Group and is now being rolled out to the Corporate Services Group. These arrangements are not just about having a plan they will sit within a business continuity framework which will include processes to enable us to take practical steps to become more resilient, to minimize the impact of any disruptive event and to learn from these experiences.
NGĀ PĀNGA PŪTEA ME NGĀ WĀHANGA TAHUA / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision
No additional budgetary provision is requested.
1. 2021
03 ARF001 Climate Change Risk Progress Report - A3094078 ⇩
2. 2021
03 ARF004 Asset Management Risk Progress Report - A3094079 ⇩
3. 2021
03 ARF010 Customer Service Delivery Risk Progress Report - A3094080 ⇩
4. 2021
03 ARF013 Drinking Water Resilience Risk Progress Report - A3104512 ⇩
24 March 2021 |
6.4 Elected Member Sensitive Expenditure
File Number: A3111500
Author: Rhonda-May Whiu, Elected Member Administrator
Authoriser: Jaime Dyhrberg, General Manager - Corporate Services (Acting)
TE TAKE PŪRONGO / Purpose of the Report
To provide information on all expenses incurred by Elected Members.
TE WHAKARĀPOPOTO MATUA / Executive SummarY
All Elected Member expenses incurred from 1 October to 31 December 2020.
NGĀ TŪTOHUNGA / Recommendation That the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee receive the report Elected Member Sensitive Expenditure.
|
TE tĀHUHU KŌRERO / Background
Formal reporting of all Elected Member expenses is a best practice recommendation from Audit New Zealand.
Reimbursement expenses processed as part of the fortnightly pay claim process are also included in the attached figures.
This report reflects the months in which payments were processed and do not necessarily reflect the months when the expenses were incurred.
TE MATAPAKI ME NGĀ KŌWHIRINGA / Discussion and Next Steps
This information will be reported quarterly to the Assurance, Risk and Finance Committee.
NGĀ PĀNGA PŪTEA ME NGĀ WĀHANGA TAHUA / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision
This is a report on financial expenditure that has occurred. There are no financial implications or need for additional budgetary provision.
1. Elected
Member Sensitive Expenditure 1 October to 31 December 2020 - A3104680 ⇩
24 March 2021 |
RESOLUTION TO EXCLUDE THE PUBLIC
That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting. The general subject matter of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48 of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
|