AGENDA
Extraordinary Council Meeting
Thursday, 5 September 2019
Time: |
12:30pm |
Location: |
Council Chamber Memorial Avenue Kaikohe |
Membership:
Mayor John Carter - Chairperson
Cr Tania McInnes
Cr Ann Court
Cr Felicity Foy
Cr Dave Hookway
Cr Colin (Toss) Kitchen
Cr Sally Macauley
Cr Mate Radich
Cr John Vujcich
Cr Kelly Stratford
Extraordinary Council Meeting Agenda |
5 September 2019 |
COUNCIL MEMBERS REGISTER OF INTERESTS
Name |
Responsibility (i.e. Chairperson etc) |
Declaration of Interests |
Nature of Potential Interest |
Member's Proposed Management Plan |
Hon John Carter QSO |
Board Member of the Local Government Protection Programme |
Board Member of the Local Government Protection Programme |
|
|
Carter Family Trust |
|
|
|
|
Felicity Foy |
Director - Northland Planning & Development |
I am the director of a planning and development consultancy that is based in the Far North and have two employees.
Property owner of Commerce Street, Kaitaia |
|
I will abstain from any
debate and voting on proposed plan change items for the Far North District
Plan. |
I will declare a conflict of interest with any planning matters that relate to resource consent processing, and the management of the resource consents planning team. |
||||
I will not enter into any contracts with Council for over $25,000 per year. I have previously contracted to Council to process resource consents as consultant planner. |
||||
Flick Trustee Ltd |
I am the director of this company that is the company trustee of Flick Family Trust that owns properties on Weber Place, Seaview Road and Allen Bell Drive. |
|
|
|
Elbury Holdings Limited |
This company is directed by my parents Fiona and Kevin King. |
This company owns several dairy and beef farms, and also dwellings on these farms. The Farms and dwellings are located in the Far North at Kaimaumau, Bird Road/Sandhills Rd, Wireless Road/ Puckey Road/Bell Road, the Awanui Straight, Allen Bell Drive. |
|
|
Foy Farms partnership |
Owner and partner in Foy Farms - a farm in three titles on Church Road, Kaingaroa |
|
|
|
Foy Farms Rentals |
Owner and rental manager of Foy Farms Rentals for 6 dwellings on Church Road, Kaingaroa and 2 dwelling on Allen Bell Drive, Kaitaia, and 1 property on North Road, Kaitaia |
|
|
|
King Family Trust |
This trust owns several titles/properties at Cable Bay, Seaview Rd/State Highway 10 and Ahipara - Panorama Lane. |
These trusts own properties in the Far North. |
|
|
M and F Foy properties |
1 property at Panorama Lane, Ahipara, and 1 property Church Road, Kaingaroa |
|
|
|
Previous employment at FNDC 2007-16 |
I consider the staff members at FNDC to be my friends |
|
|
|
Partner Felicity Foy |
Employed by Justaplumber Taipa |
|
|
|
Friends with some FNDC employees |
|
|
|
|
Dave Hookway |
Resident shareholder in Kerikeri Irrigation |
|
|
Declare if issues arise. |
Shareholder in Farmlands. |
|
|
Declare if issues arise. |
|
Employee – Northland District Health Board – Public Health Unit – Health Improvement Advisor |
|
Am employee have no personal gain. |
Declare employment should issues concerning the Northland DHB arises. |
|
On property in Waipapa West Rd. |
|
Possible issues relating to the street or zoning. |
Declare when appropriate. |
|
Colin Kitchen |
No form received |
|
|
|
Tania McInnes |
Director – GBT Ventures Ltd |
Company not currently operational |
|
Will notify Council if company becomes operational. |
Member of Northland Conservation Board |
|
Conservation matters not aligned with Council policy. |
Will notify Council should a perceived conflict arise. |
|
Trustee – Northland Youth Education Trust |
|
No perceived conflicts |
Will notify Council should a perceived conflict arise. |
|
Founder – Bay of Islands Women’s Nexus |
No perceived conflicts. An informal organisation |
|
|
|
Own a section on Seaview Road, Paihia 0200 |
|
|
|
|
Having worked within the organisation in the early 2000’s, I know a number of staff, none of which I am close with. |
|
|
|
|
Mate Radich |
No form received |
|
|
|
Ann Court |
Waipapa Business Association |
Member |
|
|
Warren Pattinson Limited |
Shareholder |
Building company. FNDC is a regulator and enforcer |
No FNDC Controls |
|
Kerikeri Irrigation |
Supplies my water |
|
No EM intervention in disputes |
|
Top Energy |
Supplies my power |
|
No other interest greater than the publics |
|
District Licensing |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Top Energy Consumer Trust |
Trustee |
crossover in regulatory functions, consenting economic development and contracts such as street lighting. |
Declare interest and abstain from voting. |
|
Ann Court Trust |
Private |
Private |
N/A |
|
Waipapa Rotary |
Honorary member |
Potential community funding submitter |
Declare interest and abstain from voting. |
|
Properties on Onekura Road, Waipapa |
Owner Shareholder |
Any proposed FNDC Capital works or policy change which may have a direct impact (positive/adverse) |
Declare interest and abstain from voting. |
|
Property on Daroux Dr, Waipapa |
Financial interest |
|
|
|
Flowers (I get flowers occasionally) |
Ratepayer 'Thankyou' |
Bias/ Pre-determination? |
Declare to Governance |
|
Coffee and food |
Ratepayers sometimes 'shout' food and beverage |
Bias or pre-determination |
Case by case |
|
Consider all staff my friends |
N/A |
Suggestion of not being impartial or pre-determined! |
Be professional, due diligence, weigh the evidence. Be thorough, thoughtful, considered impartial and balanced. Be fair. |
|
|
My husband is a builder and may do work for Council staff |
|
|
|
Warren Pattinson (Husband) |
Warren Pattinson Limited |
Director |
Building Company. FNDC is a regulator |
Remain at arm’s length |
Air NZ |
Shareholder |
None |
None |
|
Warren Pattinson Limited |
Builder |
FNDC is the consent authority, regulator and enforcer. |
Apply arm’s length rules |
|
Kurbside Rod and Custom Club (unlikely) |
President NZ Hot Rod Association |
Potential to be linked to a funding applicant and my wife is on the decision making committee. |
unlikely to materialise but would absent myself from any process as would Ann. |
|
Property on Onekura Road, Waipapa |
Owner |
any proposed FNDC capital work in the vicinity or rural plan change. Maybe a link to policy development. |
Would not submit. Rest on a case by case basis. |
|
Worked with or for Mike Colebrook and Kelvin Goode |
Paid employment |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Sally Macauley |
Chairman |
Northland District Health Board |
Matters pertaining to health issues re Fluoride and freshwater as an example. |
Declare a perceived conflict. |
Chairman |
Oranga Tamaraki - Ministry of Vulnerable Children- Northland Community Response Forum |
Matters pertaining to this ministry |
Declare a perceived conflict. |
|
Judicial Justice of the Peace |
Visitations to Ngawha Prison |
Matters pertaining to Judicial Issues re Ngawha Prison |
Declare a perceived Interest |
|
The Turner Centre |
FNDC Representative |
Observer, acknowledging FNDC financial contribution. |
Note FNDC partnership |
|
Trustee |
Kaikohe Education Trust |
Providing students laptops - possible request for written support to funders |
Declare a conflict |
|
Executive member |
Kaikohe Business Association |
Matters pertaining to request for written support to funders. |
|
|
Chairman |
Bay of Islands Arts Festival Trust |
Issues pertaining to the application of support funds |
Declare a conflict of interests |
|
Trustee |
Bay of Islands Radio Marine |
Issues pertaining to the application of support funds |
Declare a conflict of interets |
|
Secretary/Trustee |
Kerkeri International Piano Competition |
Issues pertaining to the application of support funds |
Declare a conflict of interests |
|
Trustee/Director |
Kaikohe Community and Youth Trust |
Possible application of support funding |
Declare a conflict of interests |
|
Commercial |
Palmer Macauley Offices- Kerikeri and Kaikohe |
Infrastructural matters with FNDC |
Declare a conflict |
|
Private property of which there would not be any conflict. |
|
|
||
Paihia, Kerikeri, Kaikohe |
|
|
|
|
Peter Macauley (Husband) |
Senior Partner |
Palmer Macauley |
|
|
Peter Macualey |
Barristers and Solicitors- Kerikeri, Kaikohe and Mangonui |
Legal matters with FNDC |
|
|
Director/Trustee |
|
|
||
St John NZ Priory Chapter |
St John Priory Chapter |
Legal matters with FNDC |
Declare a conflict |
|
Senior Partner |
Peter Macauley- Palmer Macauley Barristers and Solicitors Kaikohe, Kerikeri AND Mangonui |
Legal matters with FNDC |
Declare a conflict |
|
St John NZ |
Priory Trust Board |
Writing of policies and legal matters as an example |
Note Interests |
|
Lions Club of Kaikohe |
Director |
Legal matters etc |
Note Interests |
|
Kaikohe Rugby Club |
Patron |
Legal Matters |
|
|
Viking Rugby Club, Whangarei |
Life Member |
Legal Matters |
|
|
Private Property |
|
|
||
Kerkeri, Paihia - no contents. |
|
|
|
|
John Vujcich |
Board Member |
Ngati Hine Health Trust |
Matters pertaining to property or decisions that may impact of their health services |
Declare interest and abstain |
Board Member |
Pioneer Village |
Matters relating to funding and assets |
Declare interest and abstain |
|
Director |
Waitukupata Forest Ltd |
Potential for council activity to directly affect its assets |
Declare interest and abstain |
|
Director |
Rural Service Solutions Ltd |
Matters where council regulatory function impact of company services |
Declare interest and abstain |
|
Director |
Kaikohe (Rau Marama) Community Trust |
Potential funder |
Declare interest and abstain |
|
Partner |
MJ & EMJ Vujcich |
Matters where council regulatory function impacts on partnership owned assets |
Declare interest and abstain |
|
Member |
Kaikohe Rotary Club |
Potential funder, or impact on Rotary projects |
Declare interest and abstain |
|
Member |
New Zealand Institute of Directors |
Potential provider of training to Council |
Declare a Conflict of Interest |
|
Member |
Institute of IT Professionals |
Unlikely, but possible provider of services to Council |
Declare a Conflict of Interest |
|
Member |
Kaikohe Business Association |
Possible funding provider |
Declare a Conflict of Interest |
|
Mike Edmonds |
Chair |
Kaikohe Mechanical and Historic Trust |
Council Funding |
Decide at the time |
Committee member |
Kaikohe Rugby Football and Sports Club |
Council Funding |
Withdraw and abstain |
|
Adele Gardner |
N/A - FNDC Honorarium |
|
|
|
The Far North 20/20 , ICT Trust |
Trustee |
|
|
|
Te Ahu Charitable Trust |
Trustee |
|
|
|
ST Johns Kaitaia Branch |
Trustee/ Committee Member |
|
|
|
I know many FNDC staff members as I was an FNDC staff member from 1994-2008. |
|
|
|
|
Partner of Adele Gardner |
N/A as Retired |
|
|
|
Terry Greening |
Greening Family Trust |
Beneficiary |
|
Highly unlikely to interface with FNDC |
Bay of Islands Walking Weekend Trust |
|
Potential of seeking funds |
Step aside from any requests or decisions regarding requests |
|
Russell 2000 Trust (Chairman) |
|
|
Trust is about to wind up. |
|
Russell Centennial Trust (Chairman) |
Manages Russell Museum |
Seeks funds from council |
Step aside from any requests or decisions regarding requests |
|
Residence at Kaha Place, Russell |
Nil |
Nil |
N/A |
|
Terry Greening (Wife) |
Greening Family Trust |
Beneficiary |
N/A |
N/A |
Residence at Kaha Place, Russell |
|
|
|
|
Cr Kelly Stratford |
Office manager at Kinghans. |
|
|
|
Denture assistant at
Kawakawa denture Services |
None |
None |
|
|
KS Bookkeeping and Administration |
Business owner, bookkeeping and development of environment management plans for clients. |
None perceived |
I’d step aside from decisions that arise, that may have conflicts. |
|
Kinghans Accounting |
Office Administration |
None perceived |
I’d step aside from decisions that arise, that may have conflicts. |
|
Waikare Marae Trustees |
Trustee |
May be perceived conflicts |
Case by case basis |
|
Kawakawa Business & Community Association |
Committee member/newsletter editor and printer |
None perceived |
If there was a perceived conflict, I will step aside from decision making |
|
Bay of Islands College |
Parent elected trustee |
None perceived |
If there was a perceived conflict, I will step aside from decision making |
|
Karetu School Bay Cosmos Soccer |
Parent elected trustee. Committee member and coach |
None perceived |
If there was a perceived conflict, I will step aside from decision making |
|
Property in Waikare and Moerewa |
|
|
If there was a perceived conflict, I will step aside from decision making |
|
Sister is currently employed by the Far North District Council. |
|
|
Will not discuss any matters regarding her role or my role as Councillor that are confidential.
|
|
Coffee and food |
Ratepayers sometimes 'shout' food and beverage |
Bias or pre-determination |
Case by case |
|
Kelly Stratford (Husband) |
Property in Moerewa |
|
N/A |
N/A |
Extraordinary Council Meeting Agenda |
5 September 2019 |
Extraordinary Council Meeting
will be held in the Council Chamber, Memorial Avenue, Kaikohe on:
Thursday 5 September 2019 at 12:30pm
Order Of Business
2 Apologies and Declarations of Interest
5 Strategic Planning and Policy Group
5.1 Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 Deliberations.
1 Prayer
2 Apologies and Declarations of Interest
Members need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as a Member of the Council and any private or other external interest they might have. This note is provided as a reminder to Members to review the matters on the agenda and assess and identify where they may have a pecuniary or other conflict of interest, or where there may be a perception of a conflict of interest.
If a Member feels they do have a conflict of interest, they should publicly declare that at the start of the meeting or of the relevant item of business and refrain from participating in the discussion or voting on that item. If a Member thinks they may have a conflict of interest, they can seek advice from the Chief Executive Officer or the Team Leader Governance Support (preferably before the meeting).
It is noted that while members can seek advice the final decision as to whether a conflict exists rests with the member.
No requests for deputations were received at the time of the Agenda going to print.
5 September 2019 |
5 Strategic Planning and Policy Group
5.1 Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 Deliberations
File Number: A2630417
Author: Roger Ackers, Manager - Strategy Development
Authoriser: Darrell Sargent, General Manager - Strategic Planning and Policy
Purpose of the Report
The purpose of this report is to provide information to enable Council to deliberate on submissions received during the public consultation period for the Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019.
Executive Summary
· The Far North District Council’s proposed Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 was adopted on 27 June 2019 for public consultation. Consultation opened 8 July 2019 and closed on 9 August 2019
· One submission was received from a submitter who did not wish to be heard
· It is now for Council to consider the submission received to determine whether the recommended changes to the draft bylaw will meet the purpose of the bylaw. These deliberations will inform the final Control of Earthworks Bylaw that will be submitted to the 3 October Council meeting for adoption.
That Council agree to make the following changes to the Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 prior to the adoption: a) Modify section 7.1 to read as follows; 7.1 Where a Resource Consent for earthworks and/or filling is not required under the Far North District Plan, then no person shall carry out or cause to be carried out, any excavation, cellar construction of filling until the Council’s approval has been obtained and a permit has been issued for earthworks:
(b) that is beyond 3 metres of any boundary or water body, in any zone, except Mineral zone and Rural Production zone, and: i. exceeds 500mm in depth, over an area that exceeds 50m2; or ii. exceeds 50m3 |
1) Background
The operative District Plan currently covers earthworks which could be considered major. Improved provisions for the control of earthworks are planned for inclusion in the proposed District Plan. In the interim Administration consider it necessary to retain the current earthworks controls in the form of a bylaw to ensure the safety of the public, their properties and the district’s environment.
At the June 27, 2019 meeting, Administration recommended that a new bylaw for the Control of Earthworks be made. A new bylaw is necessary as the Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2009 review was not completed by 28 February 2018.
The proposed new Bylaw that was consulted on was essentially the same as the Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2009; however it included the following changes:
• The definition of “commercial zone” was deleted as it is not used in the new bylaw
• Earthworks and fill related to retaining walls and swimming pools were generally excluded as these works are more minor in nature and in most cases do not warrant an application for a permit
• The guiding document for erosion and sediment control was amended to the GDO5 (Auckland Council’s Erosion and Sediment Control Guide for Land Disturbing Activities) as this has replaced the TP90 (Auckland Regional Council Technical Publication)
• Clause 7.1(b) (i) previously stated that an earthworks permit was required if the work “exceeds 500mm in depth, over a significant portion of an area which is less than 100m2. To remove confusion over the meaning of “significant portion”, the wording was refined to work that “exceeds 500mm in depth, over an area of 50m2”
• Clause 7(d) was amended to more clearly reference Part 3 of the District Plan, so as to aid understanding and interpretation
• The application form was removed from the Bylaw schedule, as this is an administrative matter and will be considered as part of implementation
• Footpaths and vehicle crossings were added to the provisions relating to damage to roads or public property for the purposes of clarification
• Clause 10.4, which relates to visual amenity of completed works, was re-worded for the purposes of clarity.
A new clause (clause 12) was proposed as follows:
• “The Council may, in its absolute discretion, exempt an owner or occupier from a requirement to obtain a permit under clause 7.1, provided that an application for an exemption is made in writing and accompanied by the payment of any required application and processing fees in accordance with Council’s Fees and Charges Schedule. No exemption will be valid unless it is given to the applicant by the Council in writing.”
The intent of this new clause was to address situations where the proposed work may technically fall within the requirement for a permit but be minor in effect. With this new clause Administration will have discretion to exempt the owner or occupier from the need to apply for a permit (with the associated requirement to provide drawings and reports as set out in clause 7.2).
Section 156 of the LGA sets out consultation requirements when making, amending, or revoking bylaws made under this Act. Consultation opened 8 July 2019 and closed on 9 August 2019. One submission was received. Based on the submission Administration undertook further consultation with its in-house subject matter experts to understand the impact of the submission.
2) Discussion and Options
The table below summarises submissions and provides Administration’s recommendations for each submission. Administration will be at the deliberations meeting to provide further clarity or advice if the Elected Council requests it.
Proposed bylaw content subject to submission |
Summary of submitters comments |
Administration’s recommendation |
Proposed exemption Clause 12 |
The submitter comments on the concept of the exemption, which must be applied and paid for. The comment questions whether the exemption will actually reduce compliance (or operations) costs, in that there is still a requirement for an application fee and processing costs; this not achieve the objective of reducing costs. |
The current charge for an earthworks permit is $460.
Administration proposes that the fee will be based on the actual cost of processing the submission for an exemption.
There is a requirement to modify the fees and charges schedule if the draft bylaw is adopted. This will need to be considered as part of the implementation of the bylaw. However, there is no requirement to modify the draft Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 based on the substance of this submission point. |
Permissible excavation depth (Clause 7.1 (b)(i)) |
The submitter requests that clause 7.1 (b) (i) be amended to allow excavation depth of up to 600mm without triggering the bylaw. The submitter explains that most standard pile foundations for residential buildings in clay soil require embedment of 600mm, and that in these instances the bylaw has been triggered. This is considered an unnecessary outcome as the difference between 500mm and 600mm excavation does not present environmental effects that are comparably different. |
In the definitions contained in the draft Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 Excavation means the digging out of materials from the ground, but does not include:…(f) excavation for building foundations and stripping of topsoil to for a building footprint;
Therefore, under the draft Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019, a permit is not required for the excavation of pile foundations as these are excavations for building foundations.
There is no requirement to modify the draft Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 based on the substance of this submission point. |
Resource or building consents and earthworks permit |
The submitter requests that earthworks permits be not required for any earthworks that relate to work that is associated with a Building Consent or Resource Consent application. The submitter explains that this will streamline the process and allow the development engineer to complete the internal checklist while they are processing other aspects of the consent anyway. FNDC already don't require an earthworks permit where a Resource Consent is required, but only where there is a breach of the District Plan earthworks standards. This rule needs to be expanded. |
An earthworks permit is required where any excavation or filling exceeds the thresholds as per clause 7 in the bylaw.
The requirement for an earthworks permit is currently triggered during the processing of building consent and resource consents among other processes that Council is responsible for. Administration will continue to require an earthworks permit where Administration has identified one is required. There is no requirement to modify the draft Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 based on the substance of this submission point. |
Administration, as part of assessing the draft bylaw and submissions, identified an issue with the interpretation and application of section 7. The table below summarises Administrations concerns regarding this section and provides a recommendation on how to correct the identified issue. Administration will be at the deliberations meeting to provide further clarity or advice on this issue if the Elected Council requests it.
Proposed bylaw content subject of the issue raised by Administration |
Summary issue raised |
Administration’s recommendation to correct the issues |
Section 7.1 (b) Where a Resource Consent for earthworks and/or filling is not required under the Far North District Plan, then no person shall carry out or cause to be carried out, any excavation, cellar construction of filling until the Council’s approval has been obtained and a permit has been issued for work:…(b) that is beyond 3 metres of any boundary or water body, in any zone, except Mineral zone and Rural Production zone, and that exceeds: i. 500mm in depth, over an area of 50 m2; or ii. 100 m2; or iii. 50 m3; |
The following issues have been identified; Applying these rules would mean a permit is not required for any excavation, cellar construction or filling that is over 500mm in depth and over an area from 50 m2 but less than 100m2. This is not the intent of the bylaw and opens up the application of the bylaw permitting provisions to wide interpretations by customers and Administration.
It is not self evident on how the need to permit earthworks or filling beyond 100m2 in area contributes to achieving the purpose of this bylaw. |
Administration recommends the following change to section 7.1 of the draft Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 be made; Where a Resource Consent for earthworks and/or filling is not required under the Far North District Plan, then no person shall carry out or cause to be carried out, any excavation, cellar construction of filling until the Council’s approval has been obtained and a permit has been issued for earthworks:…(b) that is beyond 3 metres of any boundary or water body, in any zone, except Mineral zone and Rural Production zone, and i. exceeds 500mm in depth, over an area that exceeds 50m2; or ii. exceeds 50m3
|
Reason for the recommendation
Administration has identified a need to include stricter provisions in the District Plan to control earthworks beyond what is in the current operative District Plan. In the interim between now and the adoption of new District Plan there is a need to continue to control earthworks activity beyond what is currently controlled via resource consenting.
The draft Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 that went out for consultation drew one submission that raised three submission points. The submission points raised will require Administration to consider operational changes that will be addressed via the implementation of the bylaw post adoption. However, in the opinion of Administration, none of the submission points warrant a change to the draft Earthworks Bylaw 2019 that Council adopted for consultation at the 27 June Council meeting.
Administration identified an issue with the application of the permitting provisions under section 7.1 and has recommended that these be modified so as to rectify any misinterpretation of the rules when it comes to customers needing to apply for an Earthworks permit and Administration assessing permit applications.
3) Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision
There are no financial implications that will result from the adoption of the recommendation in this report.
1. Submissions on the draft Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 - A2632352 ⇩
2. Draft Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 - A2632439 ⇩
3. Draft Control of Earthworks Bylaw 2019 - marked up - A2632466 ⇩
Compliance schedule:
Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:
1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,
a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and
b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and
c) If any of the options identified under paragraph (a) involves a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water, take into account the relationship of Māori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral land, water sites, waahi tapu, valued flora and fauna and other taonga.
2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.
Compliance requirement |
Staff assessment |
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy |
The content of this report and the adoption of the recommendation in this report do not exceed any of the thresholds currently contained in the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy. |
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision. |
Local Government Act 2002 Resource Management Act 1991 |
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought. |
The recommendation in this report has district wide relevance. |
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. |
The recommendation in this report has implications for Māori in that the adopted Earthworks Bylaw will apply to Manawhenau. |
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example – youth, the aged and those with disabilities. |
The draft Earthworks Bylaw was subject to the consultation requirements as specified in the Local Government Act. The draft bylaw was publicly notified and consultation ran for over a month. Submitters where provided with the opportunity to be heard on their submission. |
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision. |
There are no financial implications that will result from the adoption of the recommendation on this report. |
Chief Financial Officer review. |
The Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report |