Te Kaunihera o Tai Tokerau ki te Raki
AGENDA
Ordinary Te Kuaka - Te Ao Māori Committee Meeting
Tuesday, 3 October 2023
Time: |
2:00 pm |
Location: |
Held virtually via Microsoft TEAMs |
Membership:
Member Harry Burkhardt - Chairperson
Cr Hilda Halkyard-Harawira – Deputy Chairperson
Kahika - Mayor Moko Tepania
Kōwhai – Deputy Mayor Kelly Stratford
Cr Penetaui Kleskovic
Cr Steve McNally
Cr Tāmati Rākena
Cr Ann Court
Cr Babe Kapa
Cr Felicity Foy
Cr Mate Radich
Cr John Vujcich
Te Kahu o Taonui Representatives
Authorising Body |
Mayor/Council |
|
Status |
Standing Committee |
|
COUNCIL COMMITTEE
|
Title |
Te Kuaka – Te Ao Māori Committee Terms of Reference |
Approval Date |
29 June 2023 |
|
Responsible Officer |
Chief Executive |
Kaupapa / Purpose
The purpose of Te Kuaka Committee is to strengthen a Te Ao Māori perspective within Council decision-making across policies and strategies.
To perform his or her role effectively, each member must develop and maintain his or her skills and knowledge, including an understanding of the Committees’ responsibilities, and of the Council’s business, operations and risks.
Ngā Huānga / Membership
The Committee will comprise of Mayor and all Councillors as well as 12 iwi representatives nominated through Te Kahu o Taonui.
The Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson roles are to be appointed by the Committee.
Mayor Tepania |
Deputy Mayor Kelly Stratford |
John Vujcich |
Ann Court |
Babe Kapa |
Felicity Foy |
Hilda Halkyard-Harawira |
Mate Radich |
Penetaui Kleskovic |
Steve McNally |
Tāmati Rākena |
Kōrama / Quorum
The quorum at a meeting of the Committee is 7 members comprising of 5 FNDC representatives and 2 Te Kahu o Taonui members.
Ngā Hui / Frequency of Meetings
The Committee shall meet 4 weekly.
Ngā Apatono / Power to Delegate
The Committee may not delegate any of its responsibilities, duties or powers.
Ngā Herenga Paetae / Responsibilities
The Committees responsibilities are described below:
· Ensure that the work of Te Kuaka is carried out in a way that enhances the social, economic, cultural, and environmental wellbeing of the Far North District
· Mahi ngātahi mā te huihui, wānanga Recommend to Council, aspects of importance to Māori for incorporation into the development of the Strategic documents (e.g. Te Ao Māori Framework, Annual Plan, Long Term Plan, District Plan)
· Manaaki To assist Council as appropriate in conducting and maintaining effective, good faith working relationships with the Māori community (e.g. Iwi Hapu Environmental Management Plans)
· Recommend to Council aspects that the Far North District Council could pursue to develop and or enhance Māori capacity to contribute to Council’s decision-making processes.
Ngā Ture / Rules and Procedures
Council’s Standing Orders and Code of Conduct apply to all meetings.
Far North District Council
Ordinary Te Kuaka - Te Ao Māori Committee Meeting
will be held in the Held virtually via Microsoft TEAMs on:
Tuesday 3 October 2023 at 2:00 pm
Te Paeroa Mahi / Order of Business
1 Karakia Timatanga / Opening Prayer
2 Ngā Whakapāha Me Ngā Pānga Mema / Apologies and Declarations of Interest
3 Ngā Tono Kōrero / Deputation
4 Te Whakaaetanga o Ngā Meneti o Mua / Confirmation of Previous Minutes
4.1 Confirmation of Previous Minutes
5.1 Proposed District Plan Hearing Panel and Delegated Authority
6 Karakia Whakamutunga / Closing Prayer
7 Te Kapinga Hui / Meeting Close
3 October 2023 |
1 Karakia Timatanga / Opening Prayer
2 Ngā Whakapāha Me Ngā Pānga Mema / Apologies and Declarations of Interest
Members need to stand aside from decision-making when a conflict arises between their role as a Member of the Committee and any private or other external interest they might have. This note is provided as a reminder to Members to review the matters on the agenda and assess and identify where they may have a pecuniary or other conflict of interest, or where there may be a perception of a conflict of interest.
If a Member feels they do have a conflict of interest, they should publicly declare that at the start of the meeting or of the relevant item of business and refrain from participating in the discussion or voting on that item. If a Member thinks they may have a conflict of interest, they can seek advice from the Chief Executive Officer or the Manager - Democracy Services (preferably before the meeting).
It is noted that while members can seek advice the final decision as to whether a conflict exists rests with the member.
3 Ngā Tono Kōrero / Deputation
No requests for deputations were received at the time of the Agenda going to print.
3 October 2023 |
4 Te Whakaaetanga o Ngā Meneti o Mua / Confirmation of Previous Minutes
4.1 Confirmation of Previous Minutes
File Number: A4409740
Author: Marlema Baker, Democracy Advisor
Authoriser: Casey Gannon, Manager - Democracy Services
Purpose of the Report
The minutes are attached to allow the Committee to confirm that the minutes are a true and correct record of previous meetings.
That Te Kuaka – Te Ao Māori Committee confirm the minutes of the meeting held 7 September 2023 are true and correct. |
1) Background
Local Government Act 2002 Schedule 7 Section 28 states that a local authority must keep minutes of its proceedings. The minutes of these proceedings duly entered and authenticated as prescribed by a local authority are prima facie evidence of those meetings.
2) Discussion and Options
The minutes of the meetings are attached.
Far North District Council Standing Orders Section 27.3 states that no discussion shall arise on the substance of the minutes in any succeeding meeting, except as to their correctness.
Reason for the recommendation
The reason for the recommendation is to confirm the minutes are a true and correct record of the previous meetings.
3) Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision
There are no financial implications or the need for budgetary provision as a result of this report.
1. Te Kuaka Te Ao Maori Committee miuntes - 7 September 2023 - A4375020 ⇩
Compliance schedule:
Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:
1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,
a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and
b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and
c) If any of the options identified under paragraph (a) involves a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water, take into account the relationship of Māori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral land, water sites, waahi tapu, valued flora and fauna and other taonga.
2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.
Compliance requirement |
Staff assessment |
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy |
This is a matter of low significance. |
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision. |
This report complies with the Local Government Act 2002 Schedule 7 Section 28. |
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought. |
It is the responsibility of each meeting to confirm their minutes therefore the views of another meeting are not relevant. |
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. |
There are no implications for Māori in confirming minutes from a previous meeting. Any implications on Māori arising from matters included in meeting minutes should be considered as part of the relevant report. |
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example, youth, the aged and those with disabilities). |
This report is asking for minutes to be confirmed as true and correct record, any interests that affect other people should be considered as part of the individual reports. |
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision. |
There are no financial implications or the need for budgetary provision arising from this report. |
Chief Financial Officer review. |
The Chief Financial Officer has not reviewed this report.
|
3 October 2023 |
5.1 Proposed District Plan Hearing Panel and Delegated Authority
File Number: A4387241
Author: Andrew McPhee, Principal Policy Planner
Authoriser: Roger Ackers, Group Manager - Planning & Policy
Take Pūrongo / Purpose of the Report
The purpose of the report is to seek recommendations to Council to rescind and replace a resolution carried in the August 2023 Council meeting to accommodate Councillors in the hearings panel for the Proposed District Plan (PDP) and to confirm delegated authority to the hearings panel.
WhakarĀpopoto matua / Executive Summary
· The District Plan team needs to prepare for the hearing of submissions on the PDP, currently scheduled to start in 2024, which will take around a year to complete.
· Council officers came to the Te Kuaka committee and the subsequent Council meeting in August 2023 seeking to confirm a PDP hearing panel of five panel members. Since drafting that recommendation officers now understand that four Councillors want to participate in the hearings process in a part time capacity.
· Council also needs to confirm the delegated authority given to the hearings panel.
That Te Kuaka – Te Ao Māori Committee recommend that Council: a) rescind d) of resolution 2023/101 carried at the 24 August 2023 Council meeting and replace it with d) “confirm a Proposed District Plan hearing panel of: i) five independent panel members, including two with chairing endorsement and one with skills and expertise in matters relating to Te Tiriti O Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi, Kaupapa Māori and Matauranga Māori; and ii) one optional Councillor panel member made up of either Deputy Mayor Stratford, Councillor Foy, Councillor Halkyard-Harawira or Councillor McNally where: a) they are not conflicted; and b) are accredited having done the making good decisions course.” b) approve delegated authority for the Proposed District Plan hearings panel to make recommendations to Council. |
1) TĀhuhu kŌrero / Background
Council officers came to the Te Kuaka committee and the subsequent Council meeting in August 2023 seeking to confirm a PDP hearing panel of five panel members, including two with chairing endorsement and one with skills and expertise in matters relating to Te Tiriti O Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi, Kaupapa Māori and Matauranga Māori. A resolution giving flexibility for Council to give delegated authority to the hearings panel to either ‘hear and determine’ or ‘make recommendations’ on public and private plan changes was also sought. Both resolutions were carried.
Officers have since discovered that four Councillors want to participate in the hearings process in a part time capacity. An amendment to the August resolution is therefore required to accommodate Councillors in the hearing panel process. No Councillor has indicated an ability or desire to participate fulltime in the hearing process. Therefore, the Councillor panel member position would be shared by the four Elected Members.
Council also needs to confirm the delegated authority given to the PDP hearings panel as per the resolution carried in August 2023.
2) matapaki me NgĀ KŌwhiringa / Discussion and Options
The resolution carried in August 2023 regarding the makeup of the hearings panel is no longer fit for purpose.
“confirm a Proposed District Plan hearing panel of five panel members, including two with chairing endorsement and one with skills and expertise in matters relating to Te Tiriti O Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi, Kaupapa Māori and Matauranga Māori.”
The resolution carried in the August 2023 meeting relied on the five panel members being available in a near full time capacity. If four of those panel members are Councillors, available in a part time capacity, there is no room for two hearings panel members with chairing endorsement and one with skills and expertise in matters relating to Te Tiriti O Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi, Kaupapa Māori and Matauranga Māori.
The hearings panel needs to have a structure that can absorb not only the number of hearings but also unscheduled and scheduled absences that may occur (health, holidays etc), and any management of potential conflicts of interest. Providing flexibility for one of the named Councillors to participate on the hearings panel if they are conflict free and are accredited through the making good decisions course, means they can pick between them which hearings they would like to be involved in. It is anticipated that there will be approximately 20 hearings. It may be possible that hearings take up to one and half years if delays occur, and some hearings will take one week to be heard, in additional to pre reading and post hearing report writing.
A resolution was also carried in the August 2023 meeting giving flexibility for Council to either “hear and determine or make recommendations on public and private plan changes”. A decision on the delegated authority given to the hearings panel for the PDP needs to be made.
Giving delegated authority to the hearings panel to make recommendations to Council on the PDP retains decision making powers with Council. Once recommendations on the PDP hearings are received from the hearings panel, Council is then tasked with making a decision on those recommendations under Clause 10 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). Giving the hearings panel delegated authority to hear and determine the PDP transfers the decision-making power from Council to the hearings panel. In this circumstance no decisions will be sought from Council. Council will not be involved in the district plan process until all appeals have been resolved and the seal on the PDP is affixed under clause 17 of the first schedule of the RMA.
TAKE TŪTOHUNGA / REASON FOR THE RECOMMENDATION
The recommendation in this report on the hearings panel make up provides clarity around the hearings panel members and provides Councillors with the flexibility to contribute to hearings where they are conflict free and are accredited through the making good decisions course.
It is considered that the complexity and gravitas of the full review of the district plan merits the decision making in Clause 10 of the first schedule of the RMA to remain with Council. Despite Councils very limited ability to depart from the hearing panel recommendations, it is important for Council to be involved and keep abreast of the PDP progress.
3) PĀnga PŪtea me ngĀ wĀhanga tahua / Financial Implications and Budgetary Provision
Hearings on the PDP are a requirement under the RMA once the plan was notified for submissions. Budget has been set aside for this financial year to meet the cost of hearings. No additional budget is required.
Council’s Ngā Utu/Fees and Charges 2023/24 does not specifically address the charges for hearings panel members other than specifying that hearing commissioners will be charged at actual costs. In the absence of specific rates applied for hearing chairs and hearings panel members, fees will need to be negotiated with potential parties. Some councils do specify charges for hearing commissioners. Approximate charges are likely in the range of $200 per hour for hearing panel members plus disbursements.
The cost of a Councillor on the hearing panel is up to $93 per hour (This is decided by the Council and is on top of their ordinary Councillor salary).
Additional costs relating to travel and accommodation will also apply.
1. COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AND RESOLUTIONS - AUGUST 2023 - A4345733 ⇩
Hōtaka Take Ōkawa / Compliance Schedule:
Full consideration has been given to the provisions of the Local Government Act 2002 S77 in relation to decision making, in particular:
1. A Local authority must, in the course of the decision-making process,
a) Seek to identify all reasonably practicable options for the achievement of the objective of a decision; and
b) Assess the options in terms of their advantages and disadvantages; and
c) If any of the options identified under paragraph (a) involves a significant decision in relation to land or a body of water, take into account the relationship of Māori and their culture and traditions with their ancestral land, water sites, waahi tapu, valued flora and fauna and other taonga.
2. This section is subject to Section 79 - Compliance with procedures in relation to decisions.
He Take Ōkawa / Compliance Requirement |
Aromatawai Kaimahi / Staff Assessment |
State the level of significance (high or low) of the issue or proposal as determined by the Council’s Significance and Engagement Policy |
These recommendations have a low degree of significance as hearings are part of the Schedule 1 RMA process, which was initiated at the time Council resolved to notify the PDP. |
State the relevant Council policies (external or internal), legislation, and/or community outcomes (as stated in the LTP) that relate to this decision. |
The review of Councils District Plan is a statutory requirement every 10 years under the RMA. Hearings form part of the process to hear submissions on the PDP. |
State whether this issue or proposal has a District wide relevance and, if not, the ways in which the appropriate Community Board’s views have been sought. |
Community Boards have been involved in the PDP process at various times through its drafting and are able to make submissions on the PDP. |
State the possible implications for Māori and how Māori have been provided with an opportunity to contribute to decision making if this decision is significant and relates to land and/or any body of water. State the possible implications and how this report aligns with Te Tiriti o Waitangi / The Treaty of Waitangi. |
Council is required to consult with Iwi in accordance with Clause 3B of the First Schedule of the RMA in a plan review process. This report also recommends that the hearings panel includes at least one hearings panel member that has skills and expertise in matters relating to Te Tiriti O Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi, Kaupapa Māori and Matauranga Māori. Council consulted with the 11 Far North District mandated Iwi Authorities for the purpose of the RMA, seeking input on the additional candidates for the hearings panel. |
Identify persons likely to be affected by or have an interest in the matter, and how you have given consideration to their views or preferences (for example – youth, the aged and those with disabilities). |
The PDP process affects the entire district. District wide non-statutory consultation exercises were undertaken in 2016, 2018 and 2021 during the district plan drafting to inform and seek feedback from communities, stakeholders and Iwi. Hearings are an opportunity for all members of the community who made a submission on the PDP to be heard. |
State the financial implications and where budgetary provisions have been made to support this decision. |
Section 3 of this report outlines the budgetary provisions in the current financial year to support a hearings panel to hear the topics for the PDP. |
Chief Financial Officer review. |
The CFO has reviewed this report. |